Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8378293" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>I am aware of the nature of hit points. I'm also aware that they are tied to constitution. So, if they are luck or skill or whatever else, then constitution probably covers that. </p><p></p><p>But, as much as I'd love to argue with you about how my hill dwarf Dragon Sorcerer is luckier than a halfling, it seems that would be a tangent compared to the other points.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, it is fine for them to have learned skills. It is fine for those learned skills to mean that they are graceful and dexterous. But even if it turns out that only certain races are capable of learning how to be that graceful and dexterous, then it is nonsense because only a static +1 dexterity can mean you are graceful and dexterous, nothing else. </p><p></p><p>Well, you are just flat wrong. If nothing ever can mean graceful except a +1 dex, then you seemingly have such a narrow view that it is literally impossible and pointless to try and find any solution, because the only thing you will ever accept is what is behind us.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've noticed. You simply refuse to allow anything to be meaningful except static +1 ASI's .</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you not understand what "average" means? Or "population distribution"?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? Eugenics is basically just selective breeding for humans for certain traits, combined with believing in superior genes. </p><p></p><p>You said your elf PC knows that elves are more dexterous than humans. Which is false. And that this fact is important to them. The average elf is typically more dexterous than the average human, by a margin of +1 Dex. Does this mean it is true to say that "elves are more dexterous than humans". No. Not only does that statement seem as though it is absolutist in a way that makes it false when speaking about a statistical average over an entire population, but it also ignores that in a tiny span of a few years, those humans could easily learn to be equally or superiorly dexterous to elves. </p><p></p><p>And, ignoring that, to make it an important facet of your beliefs that elves are genetically more graceful than humans, across the board, well... that dances "gracefully" on razor's edge over that particular abyss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8378293, member: 6801228"] I am aware of the nature of hit points. I'm also aware that they are tied to constitution. So, if they are luck or skill or whatever else, then constitution probably covers that. But, as much as I'd love to argue with you about how my hill dwarf Dragon Sorcerer is luckier than a halfling, it seems that would be a tangent compared to the other points. So, it is fine for them to have learned skills. It is fine for those learned skills to mean that they are graceful and dexterous. But even if it turns out that only certain races are capable of learning how to be that graceful and dexterous, then it is nonsense because only a static +1 dexterity can mean you are graceful and dexterous, nothing else. Well, you are just flat wrong. If nothing ever can mean graceful except a +1 dex, then you seemingly have such a narrow view that it is literally impossible and pointless to try and find any solution, because the only thing you will ever accept is what is behind us. I've noticed. You simply refuse to allow anything to be meaningful except static +1 ASI's . Do you not understand what "average" means? Or "population distribution"? Really? Eugenics is basically just selective breeding for humans for certain traits, combined with believing in superior genes. You said your elf PC knows that elves are more dexterous than humans. Which is false. And that this fact is important to them. The average elf is typically more dexterous than the average human, by a margin of +1 Dex. Does this mean it is true to say that "elves are more dexterous than humans". No. Not only does that statement seem as though it is absolutist in a way that makes it false when speaking about a statistical average over an entire population, but it also ignores that in a tiny span of a few years, those humans could easily learn to be equally or superiorly dexterous to elves. And, ignoring that, to make it an important facet of your beliefs that elves are genetically more graceful than humans, across the board, well... that dances "gracefully" on razor's edge over that particular abyss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
Top