Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8381558" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Yes, they do. And passive discouragement can be as simple as encouraging the opposite. And oh look, that's exactly what they did. Encouraged the opposite, which passively discourages the other path. No need for them to state it anywhere, it is just a natural consequence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uh huh, but they didn't do it to actively encourage dwarven wizards. It was at best an afterthought.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And lo and behold, what number does every race including humans get in their prime stat by level 1? A 16 or a 17. </p><p></p><p>The only way to get a 15 is to play against type. Something they certainly weren't encouraging people to do. Again, I'm not using the term to mean "the minimum viable number" or anything like that. Just the expected starting line. And that's a 16.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course they are assuming you will take either a dex race or a human. And secondly, you immediately went against the guideline by putting your 15 in Charisma, the 15 is your highest, your highest score should be your dexterity. </p><p></p><p>And look at who all can get this 16 in the PHB. Human, Elf, Gnome (forest gnome), Halfling, Half-Elf. All of whom are very much within type for rogues.</p><p></p><p>Who can't? Dwarf, Half-orc, Dragonborn and Tiefling. Three of whom are against type for rogues. </p><p></p><p>So, if they are encouraging you to play strong archetypes.... then you are going to be able to get that 16 dex.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Dude... of course you are most likely to increase your dex, it is your primary stat. Yes, you are free to choose, but it doesn't take much to realize that a +1 to all your most important abilities is more valuable than a +1 to your least important abilities.</p><p></p><p>And to get those two 15's you had to put one of them in either Intelligence or Wisdom, because Halflings can boost Charisma, Constitution or Dexterity. The 13, your third highest score, went into dexterity. So, you actually did exactly what I said you would do. Because if you put the 14 in dex (your second highest) then you would have a 16 after the +2. </p><p></p><p>Like, it is kind of funny that you told me no, then did exactly what I said you would have to do to get those results. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The game isn't easy with a 16, so you are wrong.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So.. you immediately had to specify you were building a mountain dwarf, because if I went with a hill dwarf cleric, I could get the ASI... </p><p></p><p>So, dwarven clerics can get the 16 wisdom I said. So I'm still right. You are just trying to quibble that a subrace doesn't follow the typing exactly. And why would you play a Mountain Dwarf Cleric instead of a hill dwarf, you aren't gaining any benefits that are worth it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Animal biology covers multiple different species. No races. Human biology only covers humans. Both are still biology, they are just focused fields of study. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And you do realize that there is no announcement of 6e right? That there is nothing more than fear mongering of what might happen in a version of the game that might never exist?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8381558, member: 6801228"] Yes, they do. And passive discouragement can be as simple as encouraging the opposite. And oh look, that's exactly what they did. Encouraged the opposite, which passively discourages the other path. No need for them to state it anywhere, it is just a natural consequence. Uh huh, but they didn't do it to actively encourage dwarven wizards. It was at best an afterthought. And lo and behold, what number does every race including humans get in their prime stat by level 1? A 16 or a 17. The only way to get a 15 is to play against type. Something they certainly weren't encouraging people to do. Again, I'm not using the term to mean "the minimum viable number" or anything like that. Just the expected starting line. And that's a 16. Of course they are assuming you will take either a dex race or a human. And secondly, you immediately went against the guideline by putting your 15 in Charisma, the 15 is your highest, your highest score should be your dexterity. And look at who all can get this 16 in the PHB. Human, Elf, Gnome (forest gnome), Halfling, Half-Elf. All of whom are very much within type for rogues. Who can't? Dwarf, Half-orc, Dragonborn and Tiefling. Three of whom are against type for rogues. So, if they are encouraging you to play strong archetypes.... then you are going to be able to get that 16 dex. Dude... of course you are most likely to increase your dex, it is your primary stat. Yes, you are free to choose, but it doesn't take much to realize that a +1 to all your most important abilities is more valuable than a +1 to your least important abilities. And to get those two 15's you had to put one of them in either Intelligence or Wisdom, because Halflings can boost Charisma, Constitution or Dexterity. The 13, your third highest score, went into dexterity. So, you actually did exactly what I said you would do. Because if you put the 14 in dex (your second highest) then you would have a 16 after the +2. Like, it is kind of funny that you told me no, then did exactly what I said you would have to do to get those results. The game isn't easy with a 16, so you are wrong. So.. you immediately had to specify you were building a mountain dwarf, because if I went with a hill dwarf cleric, I could get the ASI... So, dwarven clerics can get the 16 wisdom I said. So I'm still right. You are just trying to quibble that a subrace doesn't follow the typing exactly. And why would you play a Mountain Dwarf Cleric instead of a hill dwarf, you aren't gaining any benefits that are worth it. Animal biology covers multiple different species. No races. Human biology only covers humans. Both are still biology, they are just focused fields of study. And you do realize that there is no announcement of 6e right? That there is nothing more than fear mongering of what might happen in a version of the game that might never exist? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Increases (I've changed my mind.)
Top