Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Point Cost − what does a 16 cost?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7255104" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Sorry it still does not compute.</p><p></p><p>You can make it expensive but all that accomplishes is having MAD classes not choose it. SAD classes run by minmaxers will still choose it.</p><p></p><p>And my guess is that when you said only 1/8 would choose it, you didn't mean that all Rogues and Sorcerers would choose it, but no other classes...</p><p></p><p>(Very rough example; not making a definite claim these are SAD while every other class is MAD)</p><p></p><p>You see, the defining trait is still lack of randomness.</p><p></p><p>It's like when designing a feat, say. Even if it's balanced for 7 out of 8 it will still cause problems if it's OP for the remaining eighth build.</p><p></p><p>Therefore it's better, if you absolutely must offer high ability point-buy, to keep costs generously low, and instead tell your players to first choose class and then roll a d8: every player that rolls 8 gets to purchase scores of 16-18; everyone else is restricted to the PHB's 15.</p><p></p><p>Since the cost isn't too high, all classes can enjoy buying their 16s or higher.</p><p></p><p>In short; you can't balance point buy around the cost. All you accomplish is favorizing some classes over the others. You will effectively give some classes free feats; a huge advantage and a very unbalanced one.</p><p></p><p>If we for a second assume Sorcerer is SAD while Wizard is MAD (not saying that's the actual case; bear with me for the example's sake) and furthermore assume both classes are equally powerful, what would you choose? </p><p></p><p>I know I would choose Sorcerer every time if I could buy Charisma 18, increase it through race to 20, and then get to buy feats at level 4 and 8.</p><p></p><p>Since we assume the two classes are equal at start, it is highly unbalancing to offer a chargen procedure that allows one class to sport three feats at level 12, while the other only sports one.</p><p></p><p>Hence I'm arguing there is a definite point to keep costs low (or low:ish) and force players to choose class before they're told they can point-buy scores higher than 15. </p><p></p><p>In short: there is much more to good game design than merely a grasp of basic probabilities. Thank you.</p><p></p><p>Sent from my C6603 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7255104, member: 12731"] Sorry it still does not compute. You can make it expensive but all that accomplishes is having MAD classes not choose it. SAD classes run by minmaxers will still choose it. And my guess is that when you said only 1/8 would choose it, you didn't mean that all Rogues and Sorcerers would choose it, but no other classes... (Very rough example; not making a definite claim these are SAD while every other class is MAD) You see, the defining trait is still lack of randomness. It's like when designing a feat, say. Even if it's balanced for 7 out of 8 it will still cause problems if it's OP for the remaining eighth build. Therefore it's better, if you absolutely must offer high ability point-buy, to keep costs generously low, and instead tell your players to first choose class and then roll a d8: every player that rolls 8 gets to purchase scores of 16-18; everyone else is restricted to the PHB's 15. Since the cost isn't too high, all classes can enjoy buying their 16s or higher. In short; you can't balance point buy around the cost. All you accomplish is favorizing some classes over the others. You will effectively give some classes free feats; a huge advantage and a very unbalanced one. If we for a second assume Sorcerer is SAD while Wizard is MAD (not saying that's the actual case; bear with me for the example's sake) and furthermore assume both classes are equally powerful, what would you choose? I know I would choose Sorcerer every time if I could buy Charisma 18, increase it through race to 20, and then get to buy feats at level 4 and 8. Since we assume the two classes are equal at start, it is highly unbalancing to offer a chargen procedure that allows one class to sport three feats at level 12, while the other only sports one. Hence I'm arguing there is a definite point to keep costs low (or low:ish) and force players to choose class before they're told they can point-buy scores higher than 15. In short: there is much more to good game design than merely a grasp of basic probabilities. Thank you. Sent from my C6603 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Point Cost − what does a 16 cost?
Top