Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Requeriments for Multiclassing, yay or nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6186945" data-attributes="member: 6689464"><p>If I DM choses to implement them ,then it is either one or two things: </p><p>The group's playstyle already requires them, so no big deal here</p><p>The DM is upfront with them, which is an opportunity for dialog, and it helps set up the expectations of the players </p><p></p><p>On any case it will only pop up in the tables that want it or need it, the whole versatility of the system isn't compromised for a corner case, meanwhile the rest of the tables were this shouldn't be an issue are unaffected, unlike having to resort to Mother-may-I every single game on every single table when it makes more sense to listen to what is happening in-game. why burden reasonable DM's who don't fell right changing/removing the rules or don't fell like it yet? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It beats me, I don't have the slightest idea what "typical" means in this one. I just placed the stats for maximum multiclassing, but if by "typical" you mean "min-maxed" you beat me, I'm not good optimizing, I wouldn't know how to do it, I just place scores in the order they make more sense to me from the point of view of what I picture my character as. Having said that, my best effort gives out this:</p><p>Str 12 Dex 14 Con 14 Int 8 Wis 16 Cha 8, Pick a race with a Str bonus </p><p></p><p>If you start rogue (4 skills and expertise, train perception ,stealth, acrobatics and athletics), you can now go Barbarian (train Con saves) then Druid (train wis saves, two levels until you can wildshape), go Monk (for unarmored defense) now go back to rogue until you get assassination (if oyu feel like it stay another level for a feat), now mix and match as much as you want, poaching from ranger and cleric if you wish too. You can now animal shape into a very high AC hound, who can rage for temp hp, is very good at hiding, can surprise enemies having advantage on the first attack then can disengage and flee again, ending as rogue 8 Druid 4 Barb 4 monk 4 you get five feats/improvements, enough to top Wisdom and Dex. You can then have an insane speed, advantage on dex and con saves, and initiative, 3 rages per day, 3 wildshapes, a few spells, and are trained on lots of skills. </p><p></p><p>Meanwhile a simple lv 5 rogue assassin with Str 13 Dex 15 Con 10 Int 12 Wis 11 Cha 14 cannot change classes to become a cleric until hitting rogue 10. Yes this sure works as intended. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Or many playstyles will suffer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 6186945, member: 6689464"] If I DM choses to implement them ,then it is either one or two things: The group's playstyle already requires them, so no big deal here The DM is upfront with them, which is an opportunity for dialog, and it helps set up the expectations of the players On any case it will only pop up in the tables that want it or need it, the whole versatility of the system isn't compromised for a corner case, meanwhile the rest of the tables were this shouldn't be an issue are unaffected, unlike having to resort to Mother-may-I every single game on every single table when it makes more sense to listen to what is happening in-game. why burden reasonable DM's who don't fell right changing/removing the rules or don't fell like it yet? It beats me, I don't have the slightest idea what "typical" means in this one. I just placed the stats for maximum multiclassing, but if by "typical" you mean "min-maxed" you beat me, I'm not good optimizing, I wouldn't know how to do it, I just place scores in the order they make more sense to me from the point of view of what I picture my character as. Having said that, my best effort gives out this: Str 12 Dex 14 Con 14 Int 8 Wis 16 Cha 8, Pick a race with a Str bonus If you start rogue (4 skills and expertise, train perception ,stealth, acrobatics and athletics), you can now go Barbarian (train Con saves) then Druid (train wis saves, two levels until you can wildshape), go Monk (for unarmored defense) now go back to rogue until you get assassination (if oyu feel like it stay another level for a feat), now mix and match as much as you want, poaching from ranger and cleric if you wish too. You can now animal shape into a very high AC hound, who can rage for temp hp, is very good at hiding, can surprise enemies having advantage on the first attack then can disengage and flee again, ending as rogue 8 Druid 4 Barb 4 monk 4 you get five feats/improvements, enough to top Wisdom and Dex. You can then have an insane speed, advantage on dex and con saves, and initiative, 3 rages per day, 3 wildshapes, a few spells, and are trained on lots of skills. Meanwhile a simple lv 5 rogue assassin with Str 13 Dex 15 Con 10 Int 12 Wis 11 Cha 14 cannot change classes to become a cleric until hitting rogue 10. Yes this sure works as intended. Or many playstyles will suffer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Ability Score Requeriments for Multiclassing, yay or nay?
Top