Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ability Scores As Core
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 5784950" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>I haven't been able to keep up with all of the threads here, so I don't know if this has been discussed, but Mike Mearls dropped a pretty big hint about the new core of 5E way back in July of last year in <a href="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110705" target="_blank">Legends & Lore</a> in which he discussed Abilities as "The Mechanical Core of D&D." Here is a relevant quote:</p><p> </p><p>"…and your entire game engine has its foundation." There you have it: Mike Mearls proclaiming what the mechanical core of 5E will be, the ability scores themselves.</p><p> </p><p> And think about it for a moment. Let's say that ability scores aren't simply raw attributes, as they are often understood to be, but capacity in different areas of activity and ability (thus "abilities" rather than "attributes"). So, for example, Strength is not a measure of raw strength (that is, physical power) but how good a character is at doing strength-related tasks, that is raw strength in a specific context of activity. Some game designers through their systems have argued that attributes are useless statistics in and of themselves; there is no "strength" in a vacuum, only strength relative to related tasks. </p><p> </p><p> One could argue, then, that ability scores could be done away with altogether, but that is only if they <em>are </em>raw attributes which I don't think they need to be. What if, instead, they were general categories that described different areas of activity or ability? They could then form the basis for <em>everything </em>a character can do, from skills to combat to magic to defenses. And they could also form a simple core from which more detail could be unpacked. For instance, the "Complexity Dial" could be turned to different settings:</p><p> </p><p> - Ability Score (e.g. Strength) </p><p>- Skill Group (e.g. Athletics, Melee/Blades, Melee/Axes, etc)</p><p> - Skill Specialty (e.g. Climb Walls, longsword, great axe, etc)</p><p> </p><p> This gives three basic complexity degrees. The second and third degrees are derived from taking the first degree and "unpacking it", which further modifications possible through modular options like <a href="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110809" target="_blank">"skill talents"</a>, <a href="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110927" target="_blank">"skill ranks,"</a> feats, and other special traits. </p><p></p><p>If one wanted to "dial it up" from the simple core game in which all skills and character capacities are reduced to the six ability scores, there could be a standard modifier (to that ability) that is traded in for modular options. In other words, when creating and developing a character, the player can either take the "default mod"--sort of like the standard deduction in taxes--or they can customize their characters through feats, talents, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 5784950, member: 59082"] I haven't been able to keep up with all of the threads here, so I don't know if this has been discussed, but Mike Mearls dropped a pretty big hint about the new core of 5E way back in July of last year in [URL="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110705"]Legends & Lore[/URL] in which he discussed Abilities as "The Mechanical Core of D&D." Here is a relevant quote: "…and your entire game engine has its foundation." There you have it: Mike Mearls proclaiming what the mechanical core of 5E will be, the ability scores themselves. And think about it for a moment. Let's say that ability scores aren't simply raw attributes, as they are often understood to be, but capacity in different areas of activity and ability (thus "abilities" rather than "attributes"). So, for example, Strength is not a measure of raw strength (that is, physical power) but how good a character is at doing strength-related tasks, that is raw strength in a specific context of activity. Some game designers through their systems have argued that attributes are useless statistics in and of themselves; there is no "strength" in a vacuum, only strength relative to related tasks. One could argue, then, that ability scores could be done away with altogether, but that is only if they [I]are [/I]raw attributes which I don't think they need to be. What if, instead, they were general categories that described different areas of activity or ability? They could then form the basis for [I]everything [/I]a character can do, from skills to combat to magic to defenses. And they could also form a simple core from which more detail could be unpacked. For instance, the "Complexity Dial" could be turned to different settings: - Ability Score (e.g. Strength) - Skill Group (e.g. Athletics, Melee/Blades, Melee/Axes, etc) - Skill Specialty (e.g. Climb Walls, longsword, great axe, etc) This gives three basic complexity degrees. The second and third degrees are derived from taking the first degree and "unpacking it", which further modifications possible through modular options like [URL="http://www.wizards.com/dnd/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110809"]"skill talents"[/URL], [URL="http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx?x=dnd/4ll/20110927"]"skill ranks,"[/URL] feats, and other special traits. If one wanted to "dial it up" from the simple core game in which all skills and character capacities are reduced to the six ability scores, there could be a standard modifier (to that ability) that is traded in for modular options. In other words, when creating and developing a character, the player can either take the "default mod"--sort of like the standard deduction in taxes--or they can customize their characters through feats, talents, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ability Scores As Core
Top