Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 5789239" data-attributes="member: 59057">Maybe granting +1 for every point above ten seems like a good idea... but this would make characters very unbalanced ability wise..it may be better to make a passive and an active score:attack: d20+modifier agains 10+modifierand the modifier should not be +1/2 levels, but rather like the srength score in ADnDGoing up slightly in the normal human reachable range of 3-18. And then going up faster.Or just make Giants really strong:Str 24 would be quite lousy for a giant IMHO when humans can reach 18 easily.It was ok in ADnD, because usually humans didn´t roll an 18, and when they did, they stil did not usually roll a really high number on the extraorsinary strength table. So while it was possible to have a human that was near giant strength, it was a 1 in 21600 chance to get 18/00, if you rolled 3d6 top to bottom.If DnDn uses 3.5 style modfiers, i hope, that you don´t go over 18 and Giants have scores of 30+ at least. This way, you have a quite good relationship between stats and plausibility.</blockquote>