Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ability scores - How intrinsic are they to D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5717837" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>Repeating myself briefly from the 4E forum discussion, I agree with this part. This is why I advocated removing ability scores from affecting attack chance, but enhancing their effects on other aspects of the game. Damage is obvious, but it might take some creative changes to really make that pay off the way it needs to.</p><p> </p><p>But on the other side, I think that ability scores ought to be relatively modest at start (showing raw talent) and then improved only in relation to what the characters are. That is, a melee fighter should get occasional boosts to Str because he is a fighter who uses heavy weapons, not use free increases to buy Str because Str gives him something too good to ignore as a fighter. If he fights with a rapier most of the time, he'll get the chance to buy Dex up instead, perhaps.</p><p> </p><p>That kind of cause and effect switch between ability scores and class would be a signficant departure from tradition. So that gives me pause. That mostly removes the last vestige of the original "rolled high Str randomly--so I'll be a fighter". But I'd say that with the popularity of point buy in 3E, we are pretty much there anyway.</p><p> </p><p>If finessed right, it might even bring back some of that tradition. If your starting ability scores aren't so determinative of what you can effectively play, people might tolerate random rolls for them. So what that you start with a 12 Str and a 15 Int. Your fighter will get regular chances to boost Str, hit just as accurately though not quite as hard, and presumably have some niche benefits from that 15 Int that will accompany it.</p><p> </p><p>Maybe it was just us. But our Basic D&D games used random roles (3d6, assign in order). Basic had relatively little determinative effect from ability scores on class. You probably wanted something on the good side of 10 in your main stat, but otherwise you could deal. And we had more varied abilities with class choices.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5717837, member: 54877"] Repeating myself briefly from the 4E forum discussion, I agree with this part. This is why I advocated removing ability scores from affecting attack chance, but enhancing their effects on other aspects of the game. Damage is obvious, but it might take some creative changes to really make that pay off the way it needs to. But on the other side, I think that ability scores ought to be relatively modest at start (showing raw talent) and then improved only in relation to what the characters are. That is, a melee fighter should get occasional boosts to Str because he is a fighter who uses heavy weapons, not use free increases to buy Str because Str gives him something too good to ignore as a fighter. If he fights with a rapier most of the time, he'll get the chance to buy Dex up instead, perhaps. That kind of cause and effect switch between ability scores and class would be a signficant departure from tradition. So that gives me pause. That mostly removes the last vestige of the original "rolled high Str randomly--so I'll be a fighter". But I'd say that with the popularity of point buy in 3E, we are pretty much there anyway. If finessed right, it might even bring back some of that tradition. If your starting ability scores aren't so determinative of what you can effectively play, people might tolerate random rolls for them. So what that you start with a 12 Str and a 15 Int. Your fighter will get regular chances to boost Str, hit just as accurately though not quite as hard, and presumably have some niche benefits from that 15 Int that will accompany it. Maybe it was just us. But our Basic D&D games used random roles (3d6, assign in order). Basic had relatively little determinative effect from ability scores on class. You probably wanted something on the good side of 10 in your main stat, but otherwise you could deal. And we had more varied abilities with class choices. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Ability scores - How intrinsic are they to D&D?
Top