Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8242835" data-attributes="member: 12731">To be honest, I have never understood why "simple hazards" should be worth so little xp. Hazards are lethal in Pathfinder 2!Same with "Minor accomplishments". Yech! That's for beancounters only - I can't imagine ever spending time on a quest or other accomplishment if it only gives out that little xp. Such a paltry amount is saying "don't waste a single second on me, I'm super unimportant". In the AP I just played, quests gave 30 or 40 XP (using the relative system), sometimes more, sometimes less. The text never bothered with handing out anything less than 10 XP. (Something like 3 XP when you need 1000 XP is a rounding error, not a meaningful reward!) <end rant>I scaled my proposal so I wouldn't have to use fractional xp (with the sole exception of level -1 critters; because I feel 100 XP is a beautiful starting threshold) but I'll use the same solution I used there to answer you: round up to 1!Edit: thank you for your extrapolated progression. It will be useful for people that find value in keeping the "feel" of the PF2 default system!As you might have gleaned from my earlier mention, I'm basing my xp progression on the actual PF2 wealth progression. Why wealth and not xp? Because having a 1:1 gold to xp ratio sure makes things easier when you run xp for gold! To compare Kenada's and my systems, you might be interested in knowing a level 20 creature is worth 7000 XP in my system. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification