Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="questing gm" data-source="post: 3163121" data-attributes="member: 24003">Oh, i certainly didn't intend that as an accusation, don't get me wrong but is just that i think most of us wouldn't 'normally' make a connection between a game and a academic debate...(e.g, 'it's just a game, let academical discussions stay out of it !' sorta arguments)  DrNilesCrane and haakon1 have posted an interesting description for what i was try to get at. With characters as representation of different ideas, principles and values (through class, alignmnent and religion etc...), being put into a situation by the DM (based on a political, social, philosphical or ideological issue) and see how the players (as their characters) react with the DM (as an observer and mediator of what happens after their action).  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused    :confused:"  data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />   I mean has anyone done this deliberately ? Or it naturally creeps into the game whether knowingly or not and how did it happen and what did players felt about it in the end...?  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" /></blockquote>