Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Action Points Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spade413" data-source="post: 2108956" data-attributes="member: 28046"><p>I've been reading through the forums for the last month or two, and I've seen some really good advice handed out (or at the least, some very entertaining discussions <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ). I figure this is the place to go, since my group is starting our first Eberron adventure next weekend, which I'll be DMing, and none of us have interacted with Action Points before. I don't have the book in front of me (i'm the only one with the book atm, it's being passed around a lot as characters are being generated) but I think I'll give my questions a go without it. Please forgive anything I misquote. </p><p> </p><p> Action points add 1d6 to the die roll. All fine and good. But, is this a bonus or a straight modifier to the die roll in question? In other words, on the roll of a natural 1, would the expenditure of an action point modify it up? Would it change a high roll potentially to a that of a 20, causing a critical threat? We play where a roll of a nat 20 is an autosuccess, and a 1 is an autofail</p><p> </p><p> I can't see it working that way, and if I had to rule on it right now, I'd say that it's a bonus, and while it wouldn't change a "non crit threat roll" to a "crit threat", I'd probably allow for one to be spent on the roll of a natural one, to negate critical failure effects, and potenially cause success if the total value, including the roll of a 1, was high enough to suceed. It seems that even if that's not what the rules state, that it's absolutely in the spirit of what these are intended to do.</p><p> </p><p> From the other persepctive, where the Action Point die is being used as an unnamed modifer to the roll, if the action die were spent on a potential crit (say, a roll of a 16 with a keen falchion), that the same value would then be added to the confimation roll, working on the assumption that this is covered under the statement that a confirmation roll is made with the same modifiers of the original roll.</p><p> </p><p>So, anyone care to comment?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spade413, post: 2108956, member: 28046"] I've been reading through the forums for the last month or two, and I've seen some really good advice handed out (or at the least, some very entertaining discussions :) ). I figure this is the place to go, since my group is starting our first Eberron adventure next weekend, which I'll be DMing, and none of us have interacted with Action Points before. I don't have the book in front of me (i'm the only one with the book atm, it's being passed around a lot as characters are being generated) but I think I'll give my questions a go without it. Please forgive anything I misquote. Action points add 1d6 to the die roll. All fine and good. But, is this a bonus or a straight modifier to the die roll in question? In other words, on the roll of a natural 1, would the expenditure of an action point modify it up? Would it change a high roll potentially to a that of a 20, causing a critical threat? We play where a roll of a nat 20 is an autosuccess, and a 1 is an autofail I can't see it working that way, and if I had to rule on it right now, I'd say that it's a bonus, and while it wouldn't change a "non crit threat roll" to a "crit threat", I'd probably allow for one to be spent on the roll of a natural one, to negate critical failure effects, and potenially cause success if the total value, including the roll of a 1, was high enough to suceed. It seems that even if that's not what the rules state, that it's absolutely in the spirit of what these are intended to do. From the other persepctive, where the Action Point die is being used as an unnamed modifer to the roll, if the action die were spent on a potential crit (say, a roll of a 16 with a keen falchion), that the same value would then be added to the confimation roll, working on the assumption that this is covered under the statement that a confirmation roll is made with the same modifiers of the original roll. So, anyone care to comment? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Action Points Questions
Top