Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
AD&D 2e without the verbiage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 9773246" data-attributes="member: 15700"><p>Working on something similar, actually. The threads recently about 1e, the fighter, and problems with RAW got me thinking. That, and every week I’m part of a group of games played at a local bar/store and I see most people want to play shadowdark over ADnD because it’s so much easier to play, and I think ADnD has a lot to offer that gets missed because of the complexity of learning and teaching it. I’ve noticed most osr games are retroclones with some of the rules cleaned up or omitted but that’s it. I’m not aware of one that factors in all the ADnD rules that we all ignored. They were unwieldy, messy, and just plain painful at times. So why would a retroclone incorporate them? Because they reinforced an intended playstyle and balance. For example, the fighter was a really good class and not underpowered compared to a magic user when you factored in all those rules that mitigated casters (spell interruption, casting times, initiative, etc.)</p><p></p><p>I’m not saying I’m working on a retroclone that brings back all those rules. People would hate them like we hated them back then lol. There is a reason they were ignored. But instead, streamline 1e and 2e as much as possible (like I did to 5e with Bugbears and Borderlands), and bring those ignored rules back into the game conceptually, but not with the same headaches or confusion. Still working out what that looks like. Got some ideas. Instead of a billion ways to penalize the caster, cuz who likes penalties, give some additional benefits for martials. Like having a class feature that allows them an opportunity to interrupt a spell being cast within their current weapon range. Same net effect of spell interruption—fighters are more effective than people played because we ignored half of those rules, but now the intent is back, just in a more player friendly incarnation. The goal is to replicate the feel of ADnD while making it much more intuitive and user friendly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 9773246, member: 15700"] Working on something similar, actually. The threads recently about 1e, the fighter, and problems with RAW got me thinking. That, and every week I’m part of a group of games played at a local bar/store and I see most people want to play shadowdark over ADnD because it’s so much easier to play, and I think ADnD has a lot to offer that gets missed because of the complexity of learning and teaching it. I’ve noticed most osr games are retroclones with some of the rules cleaned up or omitted but that’s it. I’m not aware of one that factors in all the ADnD rules that we all ignored. They were unwieldy, messy, and just plain painful at times. So why would a retroclone incorporate them? Because they reinforced an intended playstyle and balance. For example, the fighter was a really good class and not underpowered compared to a magic user when you factored in all those rules that mitigated casters (spell interruption, casting times, initiative, etc.) I’m not saying I’m working on a retroclone that brings back all those rules. People would hate them like we hated them back then lol. There is a reason they were ignored. But instead, streamline 1e and 2e as much as possible (like I did to 5e with Bugbears and Borderlands), and bring those ignored rules back into the game conceptually, but not with the same headaches or confusion. Still working out what that looks like. Got some ideas. Instead of a billion ways to penalize the caster, cuz who likes penalties, give some additional benefits for martials. Like having a class feature that allows them an opportunity to interrupt a spell being cast within their current weapon range. Same net effect of spell interruption—fighters are more effective than people played because we ignored half of those rules, but now the intent is back, just in a more player friendly incarnation. The goal is to replicate the feel of ADnD while making it much more intuitive and user friendly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
AD&D 2e without the verbiage?
Top