Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D DMG, on fudging
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 5167296" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Of course, one can. In fact, let me make explicit that part of the reason I started this thread is because I thought the DMG passage was interesting from the standpoint of looking at certain nuances.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The latter. Although it seems to be within the realm of what he might allow, if jusified, it appears, to me, to be in the category of things he would recommend not doing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That was not my reading. He said overrule the dice any time, and then he went on to describe some circumstances in which it might be helpful. Since he did not suggest changing a to-hit roll, wrote that monsters should get an even break, and suggested changing a PC death into perhaps a severe maiming, I draw two conclusions:</p><p></p><p>1. Gygax did not take an explicit position on fudging a singular die roll in that passage. (I would be curious if he took a stand elsewhere, actually).</p><p>2. If allowed, it doesn't seem to be a part of what he's recommending.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Certainly, we're not going to go there. I just want to clarify that EGG claimed the sovereignty of the GM over the dice, but he did not say, as may have been implied by others, that he endorsed die-roll fudging in combat resolution. </p><p></p><p>I am not pointing a figure at you, but I do get a sense that I am being asked to defend the position of, say, Raven Crowking. I don't consider myself a person of extreme viewpoint. I hold a nuanced position in the fudge-versus-don't-fudge debate, although I stand in the no-fudging camp. Because the AD&D DMG is being held up as a historical authority, I want to explore what it says. By my reading, Gygax also takes a nuanced position, although he suggests some particulars I might be discinclined to do, although I wouldn't rule them out. </p><p></p><p>Specifically, nothing in the DMG I'm reading says to me, "Yes, fudge," by a fairly general understanding of fudging to be, "To alter the outcome of a die result, covertly, primarily and almost purely because the result is disliked." I would say, "No, don't fudge," but I don't read anything in the DMG I categorically disagree with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 5167296, member: 15538"] Of course, one can. In fact, let me make explicit that part of the reason I started this thread is because I thought the DMG passage was interesting from the standpoint of looking at certain nuances. The latter. Although it seems to be within the realm of what he might allow, if jusified, it appears, to me, to be in the category of things he would recommend not doing. That was not my reading. He said overrule the dice any time, and then he went on to describe some circumstances in which it might be helpful. Since he did not suggest changing a to-hit roll, wrote that monsters should get an even break, and suggested changing a PC death into perhaps a severe maiming, I draw two conclusions: 1. Gygax did not take an explicit position on fudging a singular die roll in that passage. (I would be curious if he took a stand elsewhere, actually). 2. If allowed, it doesn't seem to be a part of what he's recommending. Certainly, we're not going to go there. I just want to clarify that EGG claimed the sovereignty of the GM over the dice, but he did not say, as may have been implied by others, that he endorsed die-roll fudging in combat resolution. I am not pointing a figure at you, but I do get a sense that I am being asked to defend the position of, say, Raven Crowking. I don't consider myself a person of extreme viewpoint. I hold a nuanced position in the fudge-versus-don't-fudge debate, although I stand in the no-fudging camp. Because the AD&D DMG is being held up as a historical authority, I want to explore what it says. By my reading, Gygax also takes a nuanced position, although he suggests some particulars I might be discinclined to do, although I wouldn't rule them out. Specifically, nothing in the DMG I'm reading says to me, "Yes, fudge," by a fairly general understanding of fudging to be, "To alter the outcome of a die result, covertly, primarily and almost purely because the result is disliked." I would say, "No, don't fudge," but I don't read anything in the DMG I categorically disagree with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D DMG, on fudging
Top