Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D First Edition inferior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 393845" data-attributes="member: 812"><p>What does being backward have to do with it? It's a question of value.</p><p></p><p>Ryan Dancey has been pretty clear about the motives of the SRD -- to drive sales of the Player's Handbook. The PHB is the cash cow for D&D. It's what TSR made practically ALL their money on. Everything else a company like WotC does is to drive sales of the PHB.</p><p></p><p>Hence, the Open Gaming notion and the SRD. To make it easier for third parties to publish the "support" stuff that makes less money, so that more and more people will be encouraged to buy the PHB.</p><p></p><p>Given that, where's the motivation for WotC to release material for other editions of the game? That will only DISCOURAGE people from buying the 3E PHB. If they can get along with lots of new material for their existing 2E or 1E PHB then why buy the new one? That strategy makes no sense.</p><p></p><p>So what? Where's the value to WotC -- given that their primary goal is driving sales of the 3E PHB. What you propose would interfere with that objective and so defeats the purpose of the SRD in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Again, so what? Why does WotC want a BROADER market? They want a tightly focused market, focused on the 3E PHB. You misunderstand the whole point of the SRD and the Open Gaming movement as created by Ryan Dancey and WotC.</p><p></p><p>Less products for them to support, more dependence in the market on their primary product, more money for less effort. That's good business.</p><p></p><p>Making EVERYONE happy -- that's almost always bad business.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 393845, member: 812"] What does being backward have to do with it? It's a question of value. Ryan Dancey has been pretty clear about the motives of the SRD -- to drive sales of the Player's Handbook. The PHB is the cash cow for D&D. It's what TSR made practically ALL their money on. Everything else a company like WotC does is to drive sales of the PHB. Hence, the Open Gaming notion and the SRD. To make it easier for third parties to publish the "support" stuff that makes less money, so that more and more people will be encouraged to buy the PHB. Given that, where's the motivation for WotC to release material for other editions of the game? That will only DISCOURAGE people from buying the 3E PHB. If they can get along with lots of new material for their existing 2E or 1E PHB then why buy the new one? That strategy makes no sense. So what? Where's the value to WotC -- given that their primary goal is driving sales of the 3E PHB. What you propose would interfere with that objective and so defeats the purpose of the SRD in the first place. Again, so what? Why does WotC want a BROADER market? They want a tightly focused market, focused on the 3E PHB. You misunderstand the whole point of the SRD and the Open Gaming movement as created by Ryan Dancey and WotC. Less products for them to support, more dependence in the market on their primary product, more money for less effort. That's good business. Making EVERYONE happy -- that's almost always bad business. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D First Edition inferior?
Top