Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 394944" data-attributes="member: 5834">ReTo answer the original question, 1st edition D and D is inferior to Third edition strictly from a rules standpoint. The 3rd edition rules provide more information for the DM and players to handle different situations and events that occur in game. As far as concept and creativity, they are about the same. Why? 3rd edition incorporates much of what was great about 1st edition from a creativity standpoint.As far as sex goes, I can tolerate females having equal strength for a fantasy game. I don't care.Please don't try to bring real life into it. I have met too many modern day males who are too weak to live up to the expectations of being a man. They fall back on the relativist thinking that somehow tries to teach that men and women are equal.Wake up to the real world and be a man. Men and women aren't equal. They never will be. You are meant to be warrior of the group just as you have been since the dawn of man. Stop trying to make believe that somehow men dominated the world for so long by accident.It was no accident that men have been the dominant sex for as long as recorded history in 99.9% of world cultures. Men are more aggressive, stronger, and more powerful than women. Only in a peaceful world without war will woman gain even a small measure of equality, and even then it will be hard fought. Males are aggressive, and it is almost impossible to breed out of us. It hardly means 100%, but it definitely means the majority. I don't think women should be sitting at home doing nothing. It simply means men and women should learn to embrace their differences and work to each other's strengths. They shouldn't teach lies to their children about false equality that doesn't exist in the real world, and never, ever will.</blockquote>

Verification