Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D First Edition inferior?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GENEWEIGEL" data-source="post: 405072" data-attributes="member: 7710"><p>Well, we've heard just enough of that kind of talk, my "friend"!</p><p></p><p>Moderator! Get rid of this... this... "gentle" creature!</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Just kidding!</p><p></p><p>Seriously, I keep hearing that there are aspects of the game that can easily be removed but then why not remove any of these aspects for a published light version?</p><p></p><p>Alright lets look at it again.</p><p></p><p>Big blocks for stats? Too busy! Resolution?</p><p></p><p>A one page chart of skills with DCs based on abilities. But only suggested for a DM's reference. </p><p></p><p>Feats should be just shelved and if someone later on picks up a core book and wants to use some feats they can just have an ability check to use any feat. This could be included as an option and will be an introduction to the 3rd edition. With consecutive checks to use something with prerequisite feats. </p><p></p><p>Why shouldn't someone randomly be able to cleave into another opponent anyway?</p><p></p><p>Hey, I should write that option up for OGC!</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>____________________________________________</strong></p><p><strong><em>Originally posted by: GENEWEIGEL</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Hey, I should write that option up for OGC</strong></p><p><strong>____________________________________________</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><em>What GENEWEIGEL thinks will be posted RobNJ:</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>And no one will be able to figure out what it means either. Except someone in special ed. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>I mean, you're in special ed.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>No. I mean, those in special ed will be the only ones who appreciate it because they are going on what you tell them.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Not that they think you're cool or anything but because the teacher is going to tell them to get into it for a class project.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>That is, the teacher told them to because her son is being held hostage by your equally unappealing twin sister.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>No wait! Someone as inept as you could "only" be an only child. With the way you write messageboard posts, it seems you never had initial peer review from any of your siblings.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Yeah. </strong></p><p><strong>____________________________________________________</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p></p><p>Just kidding! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GENEWEIGEL, post: 405072, member: 7710"] Well, we've heard just enough of that kind of talk, my "friend"! Moderator! Get rid of this... this... "gentle" creature! ;) Just kidding! Seriously, I keep hearing that there are aspects of the game that can easily be removed but then why not remove any of these aspects for a published light version? Alright lets look at it again. Big blocks for stats? Too busy! Resolution? A one page chart of skills with DCs based on abilities. But only suggested for a DM's reference. Feats should be just shelved and if someone later on picks up a core book and wants to use some feats they can just have an ability check to use any feat. This could be included as an option and will be an introduction to the 3rd edition. With consecutive checks to use something with prerequisite feats. Why shouldn't someone randomly be able to cleave into another opponent anyway? Hey, I should write that option up for OGC! ;) [b] ____________________________________________ [i]Originally posted by: GENEWEIGEL[/i] Hey, I should write that option up for OGC ____________________________________________ [i]What GENEWEIGEL thinks will be posted RobNJ:[/i] And no one will be able to figure out what it means either. Except someone in special ed. I mean, you're in special ed. No. I mean, those in special ed will be the only ones who appreciate it because they are going on what you tell them. Not that they think you're cool or anything but because the teacher is going to tell them to get into it for a class project. That is, the teacher told them to because her son is being held hostage by your equally unappealing twin sister. No wait! Someone as inept as you could "only" be an only child. With the way you write messageboard posts, it seems you never had initial peer review from any of your siblings. Yeah. ____________________________________________________ [/b] Just kidding! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D First Edition inferior?
Top