Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D/OSRIC: How did initiative work?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThrorII" data-source="post: 9675336" data-attributes="member: 31647"><p>No two people can 100% agree on how AD&D initiative worked, but here are my 2 coppers:</p><p></p><p>After surprise is resolved (that is a WHOLE other post) spell casters must declare their spells. </p><p></p><p>Both sides rolled a d6, generally high wins initiative and goes first, with the understanding that movement is outside of the initiative process (if you want to move, you can start at segment 1, even if you lost initiative). </p><p></p><p>EXCEPT>>>></p><p>If a missile weapon user is firing at a spell caster, and lost initiative, the spell caster must still compare their casting time against their own initiative roll. If the casting time is greater than the initiative roll, the missile hits first. If the casting time is less than the initiative roll, then spell goes first. Tied initiative goes to the missile attacker. </p><p></p><p>If a spell caster is casting against another caster, compare casting times, with lower going first. If casting times are equal, default to initiative order. If CT's are equal, and initiative order is tied, spells are simultaneous.</p><p></p><p>If a melee attacker is charging a spell caster (melee range is considered within 10 feet in the dungeon and 10 yards outdoors), you must compare the movement time in segments to the casting time. If movement is closed to within 10' before the casting time, melee goes first. If movement is closed to 10' on the casting time segment (3 segments of movement against a 3 segment spell) then default to initiative order. If initiative is tied, it is simultaneous. </p><p></p><p>If a spell caster is trying to cast WITHIN melee, and the melee attacker lost initiative, determine the absolute value of the Weapon Speed Factor minus the losing initiative roll. If the absolute value is higher than the casting time, the spell goes first. If the ABS value is less than the CT, the melee attack goes first. If initiative is tied, just compare the WSF to the CT, lower goes first.</p><p></p><p>When it is melee vs. melee, standard initiative is the default. UNLESS one player has multiple attacks, in which case that attacker always goes first AND last, regardless of initiative. If BOTH have multiple attacks, the initiative winner goes first and third, and the loser goes second and fourth. If there is a third extra attack, it goes last. </p><p></p><p>Melee v. melee when there is no multi-attacks, and the initiative is tied, defaults to Weapon Speed Factors, lower goes first. If the difference between WSF's are large enough, the faster weapon can get multiple attacks.</p><p></p><p>During a charge, initiative is not used - the longer weapon goes first.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThrorII, post: 9675336, member: 31647"] No two people can 100% agree on how AD&D initiative worked, but here are my 2 coppers: After surprise is resolved (that is a WHOLE other post) spell casters must declare their spells. Both sides rolled a d6, generally high wins initiative and goes first, with the understanding that movement is outside of the initiative process (if you want to move, you can start at segment 1, even if you lost initiative). EXCEPT>>>> If a missile weapon user is firing at a spell caster, and lost initiative, the spell caster must still compare their casting time against their own initiative roll. If the casting time is greater than the initiative roll, the missile hits first. If the casting time is less than the initiative roll, then spell goes first. Tied initiative goes to the missile attacker. If a spell caster is casting against another caster, compare casting times, with lower going first. If casting times are equal, default to initiative order. If CT's are equal, and initiative order is tied, spells are simultaneous. If a melee attacker is charging a spell caster (melee range is considered within 10 feet in the dungeon and 10 yards outdoors), you must compare the movement time in segments to the casting time. If movement is closed to within 10' before the casting time, melee goes first. If movement is closed to 10' on the casting time segment (3 segments of movement against a 3 segment spell) then default to initiative order. If initiative is tied, it is simultaneous. If a spell caster is trying to cast WITHIN melee, and the melee attacker lost initiative, determine the absolute value of the Weapon Speed Factor minus the losing initiative roll. If the absolute value is higher than the casting time, the spell goes first. If the ABS value is less than the CT, the melee attack goes first. If initiative is tied, just compare the WSF to the CT, lower goes first. When it is melee vs. melee, standard initiative is the default. UNLESS one player has multiple attacks, in which case that attacker always goes first AND last, regardless of initiative. If BOTH have multiple attacks, the initiative winner goes first and third, and the loser goes second and fourth. If there is a third extra attack, it goes last. Melee v. melee when there is no multi-attacks, and the initiative is tied, defaults to Weapon Speed Factors, lower goes first. If the difference between WSF's are large enough, the faster weapon can get multiple attacks. During a charge, initiative is not used - the longer weapon goes first. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
AD&D/OSRIC: How did initiative work?
Top