Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AD&D Style Multilassing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jensun" data-source="post: 3929121" data-attributes="member: 6504"><p>I think the term build often has a rather negative connotation applied to it. This may or may not be justified in any particular case. </p><p></p><p>When talking about concept and 3e and multiclassing the main difficulty I found was finiding enugh class levels to accurately represent your character concpet. All levels are additive so it can take quite a while before the character you are playing represents at all the character in your head. </p><p></p><p>Given multiclass characters in previous editions were rarely more than a level behind everyone else until after around level 11 it made bringing your concept into play much easier much sooner. </p><p></p><p>3e also suffers from the problem that you cannot create an effective multiclassed spellcaster unless you add in various PrC's. </p><p></p><p>Of course 1e and 2e multilassing was straight up better than being single classed.* I often used to wonder how humans became the dominant race when their class options were so horribly limited with the exception of the superman like dual classers. </p><p></p><p></p><p>*This assumes you ignore the racial level limits which, in my experience, was the most common house rule ever.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jensun, post: 3929121, member: 6504"] I think the term build often has a rather negative connotation applied to it. This may or may not be justified in any particular case. When talking about concept and 3e and multiclassing the main difficulty I found was finiding enugh class levels to accurately represent your character concpet. All levels are additive so it can take quite a while before the character you are playing represents at all the character in your head. Given multiclass characters in previous editions were rarely more than a level behind everyone else until after around level 11 it made bringing your concept into play much easier much sooner. 3e also suffers from the problem that you cannot create an effective multiclassed spellcaster unless you add in various PrC's. Of course 1e and 2e multilassing was straight up better than being single classed.* I often used to wonder how humans became the dominant race when their class options were so horribly limited with the exception of the superman like dual classers. *This assumes you ignore the racial level limits which, in my experience, was the most common house rule ever. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
AD&D Style Multilassing
Top