Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adamantine Defending Sword.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judas" data-source="post: 960592" data-attributes="member: 3917"><p>I had this almost exact question a little while ago, so if someone could do a search for me looking for posts started by me, that would be a great help for point of refrence.</p><p></p><p>A few things to note. <ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Adamantine weapons are only a +1 enhancement as of MoF.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The defending ability takes the magical pluses and either makes them:<br /> <span style="color: crimson">A.) Enhancement bonuses to hit and damage</span>, or <br /> <span style="color: blue">B.) *Special* bonuses to AC that stack with all other bonuses</span>.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Apply stacking rules.[/list=1]As per the Defending ability description:So let's say you have a (a.)+1 Adamantine, Defending Longsword & a (b.)+1 Defending Longsword. If you put the +1 to hit and damage for either sword, you are doing 1d8+1. Since the swords are magical, they have to be of masterwork quality, so right there they're +1 to hit enhancement. For sword A. it's also adamantine, so there's another +1 to hit enhancement bonus, but it also provides a +1 to damage enhancement bonus. So sword "A" is +1/+1, where as sword "B" is +1/+0. <br /> <br /> Now we want to add the defending ability to both, but wait, to put ANY magical abilities on a weapon, it first has to have a base +1 magical enhancement bonus. So sword A is +1/+1:+1, and Sword B is +1/+0:+1. Then we add defending, which does not add any enhancement bonuses in of itself. So sword A should have +2/+2 to hit and damage, and sword B should be +2/+1. Right? Of course not. Stacking rules apply, and since all said bonuses are specifically "enhancement" bonuses. Both swords A & B, are only +1/+1 doing 1d8+1. <br /> <br /> So now that we see what a waste the +1 magic bonus is on an adamantine weapon, we now switch the magic to the defense side. The Sword A is +1/+1:+0, and Sword B would become +1/+0:+0. Stacking rules applied, with sword A you still have a a sword that only does 1D8+1, but now provides a +1 to AC as well. Sword B would drop the +1 damage but would still be +1 to hit and +1 to AC.<br /> <br /> The Adamantine table from MoF:<br /> <img src="http://www.ateam.net/images/admnt.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judas, post: 960592, member: 3917"] I had this almost exact question a little while ago, so if someone could do a search for me looking for posts started by me, that would be a great help for point of refrence. A few things to note.[list=1][*]Adamantine weapons are only a +1 enhancement as of MoF. [*]The defending ability takes the magical pluses and either makes them: [COLOR=crimson]A.) Enhancement bonuses to hit and damage[/COLOR], or [COLOR=blue]B.) *Special* bonuses to AC that stack with all other bonuses[/COLOR].[*]Apply stacking rules.[/list=1]As per the Defending ability description:So let's say you have a (a.)+1 Adamantine, Defending Longsword & a (b.)+1 Defending Longsword. If you put the +1 to hit and damage for either sword, you are doing 1d8+1. Since the swords are magical, they have to be of masterwork quality, so right there they're +1 to hit enhancement. For sword A. it's also adamantine, so there's another +1 to hit enhancement bonus, but it also provides a +1 to damage enhancement bonus. So sword "A" is +1/+1, where as sword "B" is +1/+0. Now we want to add the defending ability to both, but wait, to put ANY magical abilities on a weapon, it first has to have a base +1 magical enhancement bonus. So sword A is +1/+1:+1, and Sword B is +1/+0:+1. Then we add defending, which does not add any enhancement bonuses in of itself. So sword A should have +2/+2 to hit and damage, and sword B should be +2/+1. Right? Of course not. Stacking rules apply, and since all said bonuses are specifically "enhancement" bonuses. Both swords A & B, are only +1/+1 doing 1d8+1. So now that we see what a waste the +1 magic bonus is on an adamantine weapon, we now switch the magic to the defense side. The Sword A is +1/+1:+0, and Sword B would become +1/+0:+0. Stacking rules applied, with sword A you still have a a sword that only does 1D8+1, but now provides a +1 to AC as well. Sword B would drop the +1 damage but would still be +1 to hit and +1 to AC. The Adamantine table from MoF: [img]http://www.ateam.net/images/admnt.jpg[/img][/list] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adamantine Defending Sword.
Top