Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 229240" data-attributes="member: 284">Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How dare you!He was talking about casting a full round spell while hasted.&nbsp;&nbsp; Please, try to know what your are talking about.&nbsp; Trying to bash the sage when you can't even remember the ruling correctly just makes you look foolish. I'm annoyed when you keep trying to extend this stupid arguement with questions that only show you don't really understand it. This entire debate is pointless.&nbsp; It really doesn't affect the game one way or the other, and the core rules are ambiguous enough that you can rule either way.&nbsp; It's pretty obvious what the intent was, but you can ignore the intent and rule it your way and still be within the core rules.&nbsp;&nbsp; Why try to make it another Sage bashing&nbsp; attempt?&nbsp;&nbsp; Monte already said he was right, but it doesn't really matter if you want to do it a different way.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 229240, member: 284"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How dare you![/b] He was talking about casting a full round spell while [i]hasted[/i]. Please, try to know what your are talking about. Trying to bash the sage when you can't even remember the ruling correctly just makes you look foolish. [b][/B] I'm annoyed when you keep trying to extend this stupid arguement with questions that only show you don't really understand it. This entire debate is pointless. It really doesn't affect the game one way or the other, and the core rules are ambiguous enough that you can rule either way. It's pretty obvious what the intent was, but you can ignore the intent and rule it your way and still be within the core rules. Why try to make it another Sage bashing attempt? Monte already said he was right, but it doesn't really matter if you want to do it a different way. [/QUOTE]

Verification