Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bonedagger" data-source="post: 229679" data-attributes="member: 2564">So Basically you say:It is only vaguely refeneced to that enhancements in general are magical? (Not including the part where it say that adamantium doesn't work in an Anti-magic field)And the fact that I disagree with you automatically means that I'm ignoring what you have said?--------That was kind of the point.Adamantine may be masterwork and strong but it need to be considered magical in order to sunder a magical weapon.--------Sure. Adamantium is strong. But without the note that it works in an anti-magic field that could just as well have been because of a normal magical enhancement. You could even still argue that it is still magical. Just very powerfull. The none-mortal kind <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />--------And this does contradict the PHB. Noting this part: And BTW. What questions? I only asked one.- I asked where it said adamantium keep working in a anti-magic field. I also said that since I hadn't found that part I saw no reason to call adamantium none-magical. The only answer needed for that was a direction to DMG p. 242. The rest is just BS.-------And as you can see neither do they support your view a 100%.  Ahh yes... My blind friend:This part:-------I understand that you have very high thoughts about the sage. I don't see the Corerules as perfect but I considder the sages rulings to be even less than that. But generally: As long as the rules make sense defined in a specific way I don't see any reason to come up with a definition of the gameworld that contradicts them. But I don't want to continue this discussion with an addon about the sage so...-------Conclusion:A all things can make sense if one can start ignoring the rules as you do in the sunder example. You are free to rule 0 all you want. But the rules does contradict your sharpness/hardness idea (Magic does make something stronger. The rules does say that. But magic is apperently more than that, since the hardness/sharpness of your weapon is not all that counts when you want to sunder something magical). And the rules does not leave out that a "natural enhancement" is magic. But yes. There is a problem in the rules being vague here.Note: Yes. You having keept repeating yourself at all have made this tiresome.</blockquote>

Verification