Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adding more than 1 alignment on a weapon
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lamoni" data-source="post: 2782400" data-attributes="member: 12680"><p>I didn't know I was saying this. They are seperate. Law/chaos is different from good/evil, but they both contribute to the alignment. Unless some special circumstances are present, an object is neutral. It is not lawful, chaotic, good, or evil.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, let's seperate them and pretend that you could have an alignment that is just good with no law/chaos part (not even neutral). You still run into the same problem with a holy unholy sword. Once you put the first enhancement on it, it gains an alignment of good or evil. Then you couldn't place the second enhancement on it without destroying the first. If you could, you would end up with a good evil alignment. If you think that is allowed in the rules, please provide some evidence. And if it is allowed, I want to make a good evil character as my next PC. Could I add neutral to that too? Could I be a chaotic neutral lawful good neutral evil character? Are you sure this wouldn't require a houserule?</p><p></p><p>Also, the only way someone could carry around a lawful evil sword is if it had both the axiomatic and unholy enhancements, or through the use of a spell. Making a normal sword into an unholy sword only changes the good/evil portion of the alignment so it would retain its law/chaos part. Since it is a normal sword that would make it neutral evil. If it was already an axiomatic sword, that would change it from a lawful neutral sword into a lawful evil sword. It all seems pretty simple to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lamoni, post: 2782400, member: 12680"] I didn't know I was saying this. They are seperate. Law/chaos is different from good/evil, but they both contribute to the alignment. Unless some special circumstances are present, an object is neutral. It is not lawful, chaotic, good, or evil. Anyway, let's seperate them and pretend that you could have an alignment that is just good with no law/chaos part (not even neutral). You still run into the same problem with a holy unholy sword. Once you put the first enhancement on it, it gains an alignment of good or evil. Then you couldn't place the second enhancement on it without destroying the first. If you could, you would end up with a good evil alignment. If you think that is allowed in the rules, please provide some evidence. And if it is allowed, I want to make a good evil character as my next PC. Could I add neutral to that too? Could I be a chaotic neutral lawful good neutral evil character? Are you sure this wouldn't require a houserule? Also, the only way someone could carry around a lawful evil sword is if it had both the axiomatic and unholy enhancements, or through the use of a spell. Making a normal sword into an unholy sword only changes the good/evil portion of the alignment so it would retain its law/chaos part. Since it is a normal sword that would make it neutral evil. If it was already an axiomatic sword, that would change it from a lawful neutral sword into a lawful evil sword. It all seems pretty simple to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adding more than 1 alignment on a weapon
Top