Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="genshou" data-source="post: 2457047" data-attributes="member: 13164">That's something I've wanted to know as well.&nbsp; I've house-ruled it in Pledge of Tyranny, along with the caster level progression.&nbsp; But in that campaign, I really, REALLY need clerics to be on equal footing with the core clerics as far as class abilities and caster level goes.&nbsp; I think the change was instigated because EoM casters are more flexible than core, and RangerWickett didn't want to have to complicate things by having the revised cleric suffer a penalty to MP limits on all spell lists except a few.&nbsp; They can't be going around flinging the best offensive spells, but they should definitely be good for Abjure, Heal, and Infuse, and nobody should be better at Charm/Compel Undead and Evoke Life/Death.&nbsp; Not sure why the domain abilities are gone.&nbsp; I'm sure RW can tell us what his reasoning was. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="genshou, post: 2457047, member: 13164"] That's something I've wanted to know as well. I've house-ruled it in Pledge of Tyranny, along with the caster level progression. But in that campaign, I really, REALLY need clerics to be on equal footing with the core clerics as far as class abilities and caster level goes. I think the change was instigated because EoM casters are more flexible than core, and [B]RangerWickett[/B] didn't want to have to complicate things by having the revised cleric suffer a [I]penalty[/I] to MP limits on all spell lists except a few. They can't be going around flinging the best offensive spells, but they should definitely be good for Abjure, Heal, and Infuse, and nobody should be better at Charm/Compel Undead and Evoke Life/Death. Not sure why the domain abilities are gone. I'm sure RW can tell us what his reasoning was. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification