Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Adjudicating Readied Actions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 84497" data-attributes="member: 1118"><p>But wouldn't that turn a readied action into a delayed action in some cases?</p><p></p><p>Delayed Action is hardly ever used as it is.</p><p></p><p>But, I do understand what you're saying. I just don't know if there are any deeper impact to this ruling. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmmmmm.....before, if you readied an action, you were always ahead of the opponent in the initiative score, and thus you could continue to ready an action against that opponent (Fighter who keeps readying an action against a wizard who is casting spells). This would allow a situation where the fighter could attempt to disrupt the wizard one round, but the next he couldn't prepare a readied action until after the wizard had gone (Wizard moves back 30ft and starts to cast a spell).</p><p></p><p>Maybe you wouldn't consider the wizard to have used a MEA and a standard action in that case, but I don't know if that's what you meant.</p><p></p><p>[Edit]</p><p>Actually, I think I would rule that if your readied action didn't go until AFTER the person has completed his round then it's really a DELAY that they used. If the fighter had stepped around the corner at the beginning of the round and the archers fired, then I would rule that they used a readied action. The fighter could then step back around the corner if he wished. If the fighter, as the last part of his turn stepped around the corner, it's not really a readied action because they aren't interrupting an action in progress, they are reacting to an action that's just finished.</p><p></p><p>I guess, what I'm saying is that I agree with you, but I don't see it as a rule change to readied actions per se, just as a changing of the action from readied to delay.</p><p></p><p>IceBear</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceBear, post: 84497, member: 1118"] But wouldn't that turn a readied action into a delayed action in some cases? Delayed Action is hardly ever used as it is. But, I do understand what you're saying. I just don't know if there are any deeper impact to this ruling. Hmmmmm.....before, if you readied an action, you were always ahead of the opponent in the initiative score, and thus you could continue to ready an action against that opponent (Fighter who keeps readying an action against a wizard who is casting spells). This would allow a situation where the fighter could attempt to disrupt the wizard one round, but the next he couldn't prepare a readied action until after the wizard had gone (Wizard moves back 30ft and starts to cast a spell). Maybe you wouldn't consider the wizard to have used a MEA and a standard action in that case, but I don't know if that's what you meant. [Edit] Actually, I think I would rule that if your readied action didn't go until AFTER the person has completed his round then it's really a DELAY that they used. If the fighter had stepped around the corner at the beginning of the round and the archers fired, then I would rule that they used a readied action. The fighter could then step back around the corner if he wished. If the fighter, as the last part of his turn stepped around the corner, it's not really a readied action because they aren't interrupting an action in progress, they are reacting to an action that's just finished. I guess, what I'm saying is that I agree with you, but I don't see it as a rule change to readied actions per se, just as a changing of the action from readied to delay. IceBear [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Adjudicating Readied Actions
Top