Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HellHound" data-source="post: 2306981" data-attributes="member: 3397">Wow. I'm now one of the &quot;uncouth pricks in the crowd&quot; and &quot;don't think about what I say because I love to hear myself talk&quot;. I think I hsall add it to my .sigI didn't take this to personal insults, I tried to point out what I thought were falacies in the arguments you posted. I would certainly appreciate it if you didn't take this to personal insults (aka &quot;flames&quot;) either.Unfortunately, you did not indicate that the material you posted was written by someone other than youself. Instead, you launched into the post by heaping abuse on a product and then providing half-rules material to 'fix it'. The fact that the material was written by someone else doesn't change the fact that you posted it without crediting the source, that the material in question is offensive in tone, and that I still don't think that any of this handles the problems inherent in this 'fixed' system.I still find it interesting and inherently false that this system espouses a belief that a single bullet from a handgun can knock a target back 10 feet, but not move the firer any noticeable distance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HellHound, post: 2306981, member: 3397"] Wow. I'm now one of the "uncouth pricks in the crowd" and "don't think about what I say because I love to hear myself talk". I think I hsall add it to my .sig I didn't take this to personal insults, I tried to point out what I thought were falacies in the arguments you posted. I would certainly appreciate it if you didn't take this to personal insults (aka "flames") either. Unfortunately, you did not indicate that the material you posted was written by someone other than youself. Instead, you launched into the post by heaping abuse on a product and then providing half-rules material to 'fix it'. The fact that the material was written by someone else doesn't change the fact that you posted it without crediting the source, that the material in question is offensive in tone, and that I still don't think that any of this handles the problems inherent in this 'fixed' system. I still find it interesting and inherently false that this system espouses a belief that a single bullet from a handgun can knock a target back 10 feet, but not move the firer any noticeable distance. [/QUOTE]

Verification