Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Adopting/Adapting BitD's Engagement Roll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="darkbard" data-source="post: 7552969" data-attributes="member: 1282"><p>I've never been fully satisfied by 4E's loose (or, at the other extreme, extremely prescribed) framework for the combat scene, with regard to grid position and also surprise elements, and so I think a scene-framing iteration of the game might benefit from Blades in the Dark's Engagement roll, but I haven't worked out all the details yet. </p><p></p><p>Essentially, I am vexed by how best to start initial encounter distance (and also, to a lesser extent, awareness between the parties) for situations where PC action declarations don't make this abundantly clear, like random encounters, failures after skill challenges leading to additional encounters, and so on. For example, the party travels along a road between villages; goblin marauders have set an ambush for unwary travelers; how to set the "pieces" on the combat grid and determine awareness between the parties in a way that doesn't rely upon DM fiat only but rather considers player investment and preparation for the scenario?</p><p></p><p>Briefly, BitD's Engagement roll is a dice pool of unmodified d6s, where the result(s) of only the highest die is considered and 1-3 = poor result, 4/5 = mixed result, 6 = good result, and a critical (more than one 6) = exceptional result. The group rolls a single d6 for luck, modified by situational factors, adding or subtracting as many dice as is appropriate to the situation.</p><p></p><p>For a 4E iteration, I was thinking that a single PC takes the lead and makes the roll, depending on the fictional situation. (The Elf Ranger might take the lead through the forest path, whereas the Drow Cleric trained in Dungeoneering and Stealth may do so whilst traversing the Underdark.) Said character can spend an AP for an additional die, and a single other character can spend a Healing Surge for an additional die. Additional situational modifiers could include the lead character's training in one or more of Dungeoneering, Nature, Perception, or Stealth as appropriate to the fiction. I haven't given much thought to negative modifiers yet, but they could include factors like enemy readiness, special senses, etc.</p><p></p><p>The Engagement roll result would set both position (on the combat grid) and status (surprised, etc.).</p><p></p><p>Something like:</p><p></p><p>Critical (more than one 6) = PCs gain surprise and choose position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares.</p><p></p><p>6 = PCs choose position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares.</p><p></p><p>4/5 = GM chooses position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares.</p><p></p><p>1-3 = PCs are surprised and GM chooses position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares.</p><p></p><p>Ex. A Ranger leads his group through the wilderness when they come upon a pack of gnolls devouring the remains of a lost hunter from a nearby village. The Ranger rolls 1d6 for sheer luck, takes +1d6 each for being trained in Nature, Perception, and Stealth (since this takes place in the forest), but takes -1d6 each for the gnolls' keen sense of smell and the party's Fighter's noisy approach in metal armor. The Ranger decides not to spend an AP, but the Fighter, guilty over his negative impact, decides to spend a Healing Surge for an additional die. So, in total 3d6 are rolled: 2, 1, 5. Result: neither group is surprised, and the GM places the PCs on the board at her discretion, either 5 or 10 squares from the gnolls.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts regarding implementing such a subsystem? Especially with regard to negative situational modifiers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="darkbard, post: 7552969, member: 1282"] I've never been fully satisfied by 4E's loose (or, at the other extreme, extremely prescribed) framework for the combat scene, with regard to grid position and also surprise elements, and so I think a scene-framing iteration of the game might benefit from Blades in the Dark's Engagement roll, but I haven't worked out all the details yet. Essentially, I am vexed by how best to start initial encounter distance (and also, to a lesser extent, awareness between the parties) for situations where PC action declarations don't make this abundantly clear, like random encounters, failures after skill challenges leading to additional encounters, and so on. For example, the party travels along a road between villages; goblin marauders have set an ambush for unwary travelers; how to set the "pieces" on the combat grid and determine awareness between the parties in a way that doesn't rely upon DM fiat only but rather considers player investment and preparation for the scenario? Briefly, BitD's Engagement roll is a dice pool of unmodified d6s, where the result(s) of only the highest die is considered and 1-3 = poor result, 4/5 = mixed result, 6 = good result, and a critical (more than one 6) = exceptional result. The group rolls a single d6 for luck, modified by situational factors, adding or subtracting as many dice as is appropriate to the situation. For a 4E iteration, I was thinking that a single PC takes the lead and makes the roll, depending on the fictional situation. (The Elf Ranger might take the lead through the forest path, whereas the Drow Cleric trained in Dungeoneering and Stealth may do so whilst traversing the Underdark.) Said character can spend an AP for an additional die, and a single other character can spend a Healing Surge for an additional die. Additional situational modifiers could include the lead character's training in one or more of Dungeoneering, Nature, Perception, or Stealth as appropriate to the fiction. I haven't given much thought to negative modifiers yet, but they could include factors like enemy readiness, special senses, etc. The Engagement roll result would set both position (on the combat grid) and status (surprised, etc.). Something like: Critical (more than one 6) = PCs gain surprise and choose position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares. 6 = PCs choose position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares. 4/5 = GM chooses position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares. 1-3 = PCs are surprised and GM chooses position relative to closest enemy at their choice of 5 or 10 squares. Ex. A Ranger leads his group through the wilderness when they come upon a pack of gnolls devouring the remains of a lost hunter from a nearby village. The Ranger rolls 1d6 for sheer luck, takes +1d6 each for being trained in Nature, Perception, and Stealth (since this takes place in the forest), but takes -1d6 each for the gnolls' keen sense of smell and the party's Fighter's noisy approach in metal armor. The Ranger decides not to spend an AP, but the Fighter, guilty over his negative impact, decides to spend a Healing Surge for an additional die. So, in total 3d6 are rolled: 2, 1, 5. Result: neither group is surprised, and the GM places the PCs on the board at her discretion, either 5 or 10 squares from the gnolls. Thoughts regarding implementing such a subsystem? Especially with regard to negative situational modifiers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Adopting/Adapting BitD's Engagement Roll
Top