Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 688292" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p></p><p></p><p>lets not make this personal, ok? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>there's nothing wrong with 'darker aspects' but the current mechanic for dealing with them is just wrong. The unwilling status needs to be split into at least two statuses - unenthusiastic perhaps to indicate a potentially willing lover who is 'not in the mood' vs unwilling which needs a major rewrite.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>again, this has nothign to do with nerves, except insofar as I'm willing to bring this sort of thing front and center. It seems that you haven't really looked at what some of your feats and charts are really saying, and I'd much rather you did that and kept the NC as a realistic and non-creepy part of the game, than 'sanitize' it and let individual DMs be creepy on their own.</p><p></p><p>for one thing, if NC is part of the core rules, this allows a section on 'vile defenses' which I would want to work on. much better than campaigns where 'mature' content is thrown in without allowing the characters to be realisticly prepared for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is all about mechanics and facing up to what they are. Let me spell the problem with the core mechanics out. A 10th level rogue with maxed out arrousal in a hard focus game sees a second level commoner he wants. The commoner absolutely does not want him for any combination of reasons. She is declared 'unwilling' and as a low level character gets a small bonus to her miniscule will save. After a couple of subdual sneak attacks and use rope checks, said rogue rapes her. He has the Force Pleasure feat, a couple of other "enhancements" and gloves of dex that he leaves on for the event. The fact that he is raping her is counted only as a small bonus to an opposed check and he rolls very well. By the mechanics which we have now, she has had a</p><p></p><p>Heavenly Experience - Things were done in the bedroom that are the stuff of legends and ribald pornographic etchings! The gods and goddesses of lust would be proud of you. In time, you may even draw their notice and be whisked away to visit them! +5 bonus to Charisma-related checks when dealing with this person for the next 1d4 weeks. In addition, your lover will be charmed (as the spell) for 2d8 days.</p><p></p><p>This is not a sidetrack, this is the mechanics as currently written. I would recomend fixing them over getting rid of the issue entirely, but leaving them as they are is a serious problem, not for me for any personal reasons but objectivly as the results. </p><p></p><p>Fixing them would take a very short period of time and would do very little to the core mechanics, but it needs to be adressed in the core mechanics (or eliminated from them and included as a side bar that makes it clear that the core rules cannot be applied to an unwilling character.)</p><p></p><p>Kahuna Burger</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 688292, member: 8439"] [B][/b] lets not make this personal, ok? [b][/b] there's nothing wrong with 'darker aspects' but the current mechanic for dealing with them is just wrong. The unwilling status needs to be split into at least two statuses - unenthusiastic perhaps to indicate a potentially willing lover who is 'not in the mood' vs unwilling which needs a major rewrite. [b][/b] again, this has nothign to do with nerves, except insofar as I'm willing to bring this sort of thing front and center. It seems that you haven't really looked at what some of your feats and charts are really saying, and I'd much rather you did that and kept the NC as a realistic and non-creepy part of the game, than 'sanitize' it and let individual DMs be creepy on their own. for one thing, if NC is part of the core rules, this allows a section on 'vile defenses' which I would want to work on. much better than campaigns where 'mature' content is thrown in without allowing the characters to be realisticly prepared for it. This is all about mechanics and facing up to what they are. Let me spell the problem with the core mechanics out. A 10th level rogue with maxed out arrousal in a hard focus game sees a second level commoner he wants. The commoner absolutely does not want him for any combination of reasons. She is declared 'unwilling' and as a low level character gets a small bonus to her miniscule will save. After a couple of subdual sneak attacks and use rope checks, said rogue rapes her. He has the Force Pleasure feat, a couple of other "enhancements" and gloves of dex that he leaves on for the event. The fact that he is raping her is counted only as a small bonus to an opposed check and he rolls very well. By the mechanics which we have now, she has had a Heavenly Experience - Things were done in the bedroom that are the stuff of legends and ribald pornographic etchings! The gods and goddesses of lust would be proud of you. In time, you may even draw their notice and be whisked away to visit them! +5 bonus to Charisma-related checks when dealing with this person for the next 1d4 weeks. In addition, your lover will be charmed (as the spell) for 2d8 days. This is not a sidetrack, this is the mechanics as currently written. I would recomend fixing them over getting rid of the issue entirely, but leaving them as they are is a serious problem, not for me for any personal reasons but objectivly as the results. Fixing them would take a very short period of time and would do very little to the core mechanics, but it needs to be adressed in the core mechanics (or eliminated from them and included as a side bar that makes it clear that the core rules cannot be applied to an unwilling character.) Kahuna Burger [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top