Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asher" data-source="post: 775221" data-attributes="member: 10601"><p>On further reflection, I think I should mention that many of the above comments are borne out of a desire to retain a feature of the NUCK that I liked: the variable outcome of any particular round (using Hard Focus rules). The variability was a consequence of having the Arousal DC be a moving target depending on the SP check -- which I agree wasn't very 3E-ish, but it lent some uncertainty to the proceedings.</p><p></p><p>With the current fixed DC table, if a character can bring his (please forgive the non-gender-neutral pronouns; they're just easier) partner to climax <strong>at all</strong> (likely by taking 20), then he can do so <strong>every time without fail</strong>, for as long as she can keep going. I'd prefer encouraging the character to actually roll the d20 instead of taking 20 every round, so I'm trying to think of fair, legitimate ways to discourage the "take 20" auto-pilot mindset.</p><p></p><p>Another suggestion: should we amend the Arousal DC table to permit female characters to return to an Aroused or Peaked state after climax (by supplying DC values for those conditions)? I liked that feature of the NUCK as well, and although I may be misreading the current GUCK rules, it appears that after climax, both male and female characters revert to "Unaroused" on the arousal progression scale.</p><p></p><p>A still further suggestion, based on yet another cherished feature of the NUCK: it seems that with regards to the number of orgasms permitted them by GUCK rules, female characters are getting the shaft (sorry, couldn't resist). Surely an <em>average</em> female can experience more than one climax without becoming Fatigued? What do folks think about amending the rules to permit them 2+CON mod before becoming Fatigued?</p><p></p><p>More thoughts later, as they occur to me... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asher, post: 775221, member: 10601"] On further reflection, I think I should mention that many of the above comments are borne out of a desire to retain a feature of the NUCK that I liked: the variable outcome of any particular round (using Hard Focus rules). The variability was a consequence of having the Arousal DC be a moving target depending on the SP check -- which I agree wasn't very 3E-ish, but it lent some uncertainty to the proceedings. With the current fixed DC table, if a character can bring his (please forgive the non-gender-neutral pronouns; they're just easier) partner to climax [b]at all[/b] (likely by taking 20), then he can do so [b]every time without fail[/b], for as long as she can keep going. I'd prefer encouraging the character to actually roll the d20 instead of taking 20 every round, so I'm trying to think of fair, legitimate ways to discourage the "take 20" auto-pilot mindset. Another suggestion: should we amend the Arousal DC table to permit female characters to return to an Aroused or Peaked state after climax (by supplying DC values for those conditions)? I liked that feature of the NUCK as well, and although I may be misreading the current GUCK rules, it appears that after climax, both male and female characters revert to "Unaroused" on the arousal progression scale. A still further suggestion, based on yet another cherished feature of the NUCK: it seems that with regards to the number of orgasms permitted them by GUCK rules, female characters are getting the shaft (sorry, couldn't resist). Surely an [i]average[/i] female can experience more than one climax without becoming Fatigued? What do folks think about amending the rules to permit them 2+CON mod before becoming Fatigued? More thoughts later, as they occur to me... :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top
