Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VVrayven" data-source="post: 792249" data-attributes="member: 9950"><p>Hi all! Well, I've had a chance to read through most of it now. <puts on her editorial cap> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I will try to go in order. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>1) I think there should be a synergy bonus from prowess to all Spot and Sense Motive checks to notice the presence of arousal both mental and physical.</p><p></p><p>2) The Delerious Status condition states that the person fails ALL saves. I believe this should read, fails all reflex and will saves (and I'm reluctant to say will save too) maybe this should just be autofail refelx with a penalty to will saves. Also, you have to make a will save every round in this condition (and that doesn't auto fail right?)</p><p></p><p>3) I truly believe the penalty listed for unwilling should read "from 1 to 20 or even higher depending on the setting".</p><p></p><p>4) Big Question!</p><p></p><p>Okay, Prowess checks are made in order to "inflict" pleasure on a person or object (or self), correct? Alright, then our Prof. system needs some tweaking...</p><p></p><p>We have Prof. listed such as Sodomy (recieve)... Well, what does this mean? Does this mean a person being penetrated can only use this on themselves? Plus, from what I have heard, their is as much an art to giving as in recieving when sodomy is concerned, so... Sodomy (thrusting) should be a Prof. as well.</p><p></p><p>This also leads to the question of what does DSM do? If I ask my partner to be dominating and I like to be submissive, we can do it all night and not get anywhere. It helps me get aroused.... but the acts themselves don't stimulate me. So what does making a prowess check for "submission" do? I'm not using Prof in touching, caressing, oral, or anything else, so how does this help to stimulate my partner? I really think this is a problem with our hard-focus specific system.</p><p></p><p>DSM and Bondage don't actually stimulate, they AIDE in the stimulation by using ANOTHER Prof... So something needs to be tweaked here. Even the +10 DC mod doesn't really help it make sense.</p><p></p><p>5) How are mutliple prowess checks resolved against one person? I.E. If two people pleasure a girl, do they both use her current status? Do the checks stack or act individually? My gut says individual checks, but consider this, two partners with +2s might have a much higher chance of simulating you to the next arousal level, rather than their indivdual chances... I know If I stimulate myself at the same time as a partner does to me, our combinded efforts get be aroused MUCH faster...</p><p></p><p>6) In describing the Arousal DCs the sentence should read: "and the ones on the right ARE the female ones."</p><p></p><p>7) Can a partner who is being penetrated and using a free action to reflexivily stimulate their partner use a second prowess check at no penalty to their partner or themselves???</p><p></p><p>8) I think we need modifiers for MOOD in the circumstance area. The posititive "Turned On" stuff is hadnled by the status conditions. The negative "Turned OFF" stuff can't/shouldn't all be covered by Unwilling.</p><p></p><p>9) Clothing modifiers. I like my step system, but if everyone thinks this is too complex, we need a set of 2 or three clothing modifiers.</p><p></p><p>10) Gender Bias in the Prof. DC Table???</p><p></p><p>Alright. Should we modify the DCs at all in this table for gender. I only ask this because in my experience it is far easier to get a female to climax through ONLY gentle touches than it is to get a man off in this fashion. Giving Sodomy is almost always pleasing for the thruster (so I've heard. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) but is only sometimes for the reciever. I know I don't prefer it, but it isn't nearly as stimulating and yet it has a +0 mod climax and only a +2 to peak? Is is just as easy for a gay man in the recieving end to get off like this? Just my thoughts at the moment...</p><p></p><p>11) I'm confused by the statement at the end of the Exhuasted rules: "Each round of Ecstasy in this state deals sufficient subdual damage to render the character unconscious, plus an additional point of subdual damage per HD." So does this mean if you are level 10 and exhausted and have an estacy orgasm... you die? Say 50 hp, you take 50 in subdual and then an additional 10 subdual leaving you at -10... Which does kill you by the core rules, does it not?</p><p></p><p>12) In Size Matters.... "The owner of the phallus may also be damaged – where the difference is one-and-a-half size categories or more, the owner of the phallus receives damage as if the difference was one size category than it actually is." seems to be missing a word.</p><p></p><p>13) In Size matters under larger still... I think it should read: "All pain, no gain. Concerted attempts simply incur damage as if two sizes larger with NO SAVE possible: see above."</p><p></p><p>14) I think it should read EROTIC feats, not EXOTIC feats, no?</p><p></p><p>>hugs> DbS you have done a fantastic job! <blows a kiss> I've got three surprises coming up for you later today. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VVrayven, post: 792249, member: 9950"] Hi all! Well, I've had a chance to read through most of it now. <puts on her editorial cap> :) I will try to go in order. ;) 1) I think there should be a synergy bonus from prowess to all Spot and Sense Motive checks to notice the presence of arousal both mental and physical. 2) The Delerious Status condition states that the person fails ALL saves. I believe this should read, fails all reflex and will saves (and I'm reluctant to say will save too) maybe this should just be autofail refelx with a penalty to will saves. Also, you have to make a will save every round in this condition (and that doesn't auto fail right?) 3) I truly believe the penalty listed for unwilling should read "from 1 to 20 or even higher depending on the setting". 4) Big Question! Okay, Prowess checks are made in order to "inflict" pleasure on a person or object (or self), correct? Alright, then our Prof. system needs some tweaking... We have Prof. listed such as Sodomy (recieve)... Well, what does this mean? Does this mean a person being penetrated can only use this on themselves? Plus, from what I have heard, their is as much an art to giving as in recieving when sodomy is concerned, so... Sodomy (thrusting) should be a Prof. as well. This also leads to the question of what does DSM do? If I ask my partner to be dominating and I like to be submissive, we can do it all night and not get anywhere. It helps me get aroused.... but the acts themselves don't stimulate me. So what does making a prowess check for "submission" do? I'm not using Prof in touching, caressing, oral, or anything else, so how does this help to stimulate my partner? I really think this is a problem with our hard-focus specific system. DSM and Bondage don't actually stimulate, they AIDE in the stimulation by using ANOTHER Prof... So something needs to be tweaked here. Even the +10 DC mod doesn't really help it make sense. 5) How are mutliple prowess checks resolved against one person? I.E. If two people pleasure a girl, do they both use her current status? Do the checks stack or act individually? My gut says individual checks, but consider this, two partners with +2s might have a much higher chance of simulating you to the next arousal level, rather than their indivdual chances... I know If I stimulate myself at the same time as a partner does to me, our combinded efforts get be aroused MUCH faster... 6) In describing the Arousal DCs the sentence should read: "and the ones on the right ARE the female ones." 7) Can a partner who is being penetrated and using a free action to reflexivily stimulate their partner use a second prowess check at no penalty to their partner or themselves??? 8) I think we need modifiers for MOOD in the circumstance area. The posititive "Turned On" stuff is hadnled by the status conditions. The negative "Turned OFF" stuff can't/shouldn't all be covered by Unwilling. 9) Clothing modifiers. I like my step system, but if everyone thinks this is too complex, we need a set of 2 or three clothing modifiers. 10) Gender Bias in the Prof. DC Table??? Alright. Should we modify the DCs at all in this table for gender. I only ask this because in my experience it is far easier to get a female to climax through ONLY gentle touches than it is to get a man off in this fashion. Giving Sodomy is almost always pleasing for the thruster (so I've heard. ;)) but is only sometimes for the reciever. I know I don't prefer it, but it isn't nearly as stimulating and yet it has a +0 mod climax and only a +2 to peak? Is is just as easy for a gay man in the recieving end to get off like this? Just my thoughts at the moment... 11) I'm confused by the statement at the end of the Exhuasted rules: "Each round of Ecstasy in this state deals sufficient subdual damage to render the character unconscious, plus an additional point of subdual damage per HD." So does this mean if you are level 10 and exhausted and have an estacy orgasm... you die? Say 50 hp, you take 50 in subdual and then an additional 10 subdual leaving you at -10... Which does kill you by the core rules, does it not? 12) In Size Matters.... "The owner of the phallus may also be damaged – where the difference is one-and-a-half size categories or more, the owner of the phallus receives damage as if the difference was one size category than it actually is." seems to be missing a word. 13) In Size matters under larger still... I think it should read: "All pain, no gain. Concerted attempts simply incur damage as if two sizes larger with NO SAVE possible: see above." 14) I think it should read EROTIC feats, not EXOTIC feats, no? >hugs> DbS you have done a fantastic job! <blows a kiss> I've got three surprises coming up for you later today. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top