Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VVrayven" data-source="post: 795778" data-attributes="member: 9950"><p>Heya. Couple more things for the board, gosh I've posted a lot. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Where are you DbS! <readies a tickle></p><p></p><p>First off, I think we should have the True Love feat grant a bonus to Prowess checks, after all, if you love them, they try harder and you are eaiser to arouse.</p><p></p><p>Second, how would you all feel about making a sidebar: Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder... It would consists of having a partner's charisma score be slightly variable depending on your feelings toward them. For instance two people in love might treat each other as having +2 or +4 charisma? What do you think?</p><p></p><p>Third. I tweaked my java system so that the AI routine works alot more realisticly. However, before I get into that, I'd like to address our gratification issue. First, we make a convention for a better orgasm to grant a higher gratification, so I find it a little odd that Estacy grants only a 1 gratification and is very difficult to grant it more... In addition, if you happen to make your partner climax twice in a row, the second one will grant less gratification on average due to the high DC required... So I propose the following change:</p><p></p><p>"When a character becomes Climaxed or Ecstastic, they receive a gratification point plus an additional point for every 5 points by which the test exceeds the base climax DC, rounded down to a minimum of 1. Keep a tally of this for each partner and consult the Gratification table at the end of proceedings.</p><p></p><p>Examples: </p><p></p><p>Female is peaked, partner makes DC 26 (target DC 20), the gratificiation is 2 (1 + 6/5 round down).</p><p></p><p>Female is climaxed, partner makes a DC 41 (target DC 40 base 20), the gratification is 5 (1 + 21/5 round down).</p><p></p><p>Female is peaked, partner makes a DC 46 (target DC 40 for estacy, base 20), the gratification is 6 (1 + 26/5).</p><p></p><p>What do you think? In either case, the Gratification table for Hard Focus needs to be reworked, and I'll explain why later.</p><p></p><p>As for my new program results:</p><p></p><p>The two partners now foreplay each other until they are both Aroused. If one partner is aroused and the other is not, they both try to arouse the one which is not. After this, intercourse begins. The DC table has been modified so that once aroused, a male cannot loose Arousal. They remain at intercourse, even if the female drops to no Arousal. (all the penalties are in there). This continues until the girl passes out or the male experiences his first climax.</p><p></p><p>Using the standard just go, no resist method:</p><p>Intercourse Time: 12 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.05, Female Climax Chance: 2.7%</p><p></p><p>If male resists after he is aroused, and the female tried to please herself and just reflexively tried her partner:</p><p>Intercourse Time: 8 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.33, Female Climax Chance: 16.2%</p><p></p><p>So, women are pretty much just out of luck... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> But then again, I guess it was so for a long time...</p><p></p><p>However, if you give one rank of prowess and a +1 Fort Save...</p><p>Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.87, Female Climax Chance: 37.2%</p><p>two ranks of prowess and a +1 Fort Save...</p><p>Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 1.38, Female Climax Chance: 56.8%</p><p>three ranks of prowess and a +1 Fort Save...</p><p>Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 1.93, Female Climax Chance: 68.5%</p><p></p><p>in the above rank is synonimis with total prowess bonus...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VVrayven, post: 795778, member: 9950"] Heya. Couple more things for the board, gosh I've posted a lot. ;) Where are you DbS! <readies a tickle> First off, I think we should have the True Love feat grant a bonus to Prowess checks, after all, if you love them, they try harder and you are eaiser to arouse. Second, how would you all feel about making a sidebar: Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder... It would consists of having a partner's charisma score be slightly variable depending on your feelings toward them. For instance two people in love might treat each other as having +2 or +4 charisma? What do you think? Third. I tweaked my java system so that the AI routine works alot more realisticly. However, before I get into that, I'd like to address our gratification issue. First, we make a convention for a better orgasm to grant a higher gratification, so I find it a little odd that Estacy grants only a 1 gratification and is very difficult to grant it more... In addition, if you happen to make your partner climax twice in a row, the second one will grant less gratification on average due to the high DC required... So I propose the following change: "When a character becomes Climaxed or Ecstastic, they receive a gratification point plus an additional point for every 5 points by which the test exceeds the base climax DC, rounded down to a minimum of 1. Keep a tally of this for each partner and consult the Gratification table at the end of proceedings. Examples: Female is peaked, partner makes DC 26 (target DC 20), the gratificiation is 2 (1 + 6/5 round down). Female is climaxed, partner makes a DC 41 (target DC 40 base 20), the gratification is 5 (1 + 21/5 round down). Female is peaked, partner makes a DC 46 (target DC 40 for estacy, base 20), the gratification is 6 (1 + 26/5). What do you think? In either case, the Gratification table for Hard Focus needs to be reworked, and I'll explain why later. As for my new program results: The two partners now foreplay each other until they are both Aroused. If one partner is aroused and the other is not, they both try to arouse the one which is not. After this, intercourse begins. The DC table has been modified so that once aroused, a male cannot loose Arousal. They remain at intercourse, even if the female drops to no Arousal. (all the penalties are in there). This continues until the girl passes out or the male experiences his first climax. Using the standard just go, no resist method: Intercourse Time: 12 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.05, Female Climax Chance: 2.7% If male resists after he is aroused, and the female tried to please herself and just reflexively tried her partner: Intercourse Time: 8 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.33, Female Climax Chance: 16.2% So, women are pretty much just out of luck... :( But then again, I guess it was so for a long time... However, if you give one rank of prowess and a +1 Fort Save... Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 0.87, Female Climax Chance: 37.2% two ranks of prowess and a +1 Fort Save... Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 1.38, Female Climax Chance: 56.8% three ranks of prowess and a +1 Fort Save... Intercourse Time: 9 rounds, Avg Female Orgasm: 1.93, Female Climax Chance: 68.5% in the above rank is synonimis with total prowess bonus... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top