Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Death By Surfeit" data-source="post: 809853" data-attributes="member: 8646"><p>Wotcher,</p><p></p><p>Apologies once again for the lateness of reply – (insert witty excuse of your choosing here). To address VVrayven’s pertinent questions and wonderful additions:</p><p></p><p>1) From what I gather, most satisfaction in sodomy is to the penetrator – hence receiving is the only proficiency, as it is used by the recipient against the penetrator.We could allow a penetration prof, as satisfaction is <em>possible</em>, it is difficult (cue penalties).</p><p>2) Erm… ahh… I’ll get back to you on this one.</p><p>3) I’d suggest that most proficiencies be impossible whilst in clothing. Caressing would be possible but with a penalty of –2 to –6 based on thickness of clothing (impossible on opponents wearing armour). Some rules for time spent removing clothing, or unbuckling essential areas, would be appreciated from the team at large. Perhaps 3e armour style: Don, Remove, Remove Hastily <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="(:" title="Smile (:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname="(:" />D).</p><p>4) You’ve somewhat omitted any calculations featuring satisfaction for men. Whilst they cannot sustain quite so many Climaxed states, their DC is significantly lower, hence each orgasm gives more satisfaction tha a woman, given identical rolls. I (roughly) assume this works out to be pretty much on a level with women.</p><p>5) My personal opinion on the matter is that it is fine – 3e features an eventual shift of balance from defence winning to offence winning as levels progress (to offset higher hit points somewhat), and this is only kept in accordance. However, if anyone has complaints or would like to suggest an alternative system, fire away.</p><p>6) Hmmm… +2. And the system, may I add, is absolutely fantastic. I couldn’t have managed anything near as good myself.</p><p></p><p>To address your other point, we will, of course, require a little good sense where DMs are concerned – Caress (breasts) will have little effect on a male partner, if any. A brief note asking DMs to exercise a little sensibility would not go amiss where proficiencies are concerned. Anyways, enough from the answer guy for now – I’m off to type up a few notes on kinks.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p></p><p>DbS</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Death By Surfeit, post: 809853, member: 8646"] Wotcher, Apologies once again for the lateness of reply – (insert witty excuse of your choosing here). To address VVrayven’s pertinent questions and wonderful additions: 1) From what I gather, most satisfaction in sodomy is to the penetrator – hence receiving is the only proficiency, as it is used by the recipient against the penetrator.We could allow a penetration prof, as satisfaction is [I]possible[/I], it is difficult (cue penalties). 2) Erm… ahh… I’ll get back to you on this one. 3) I’d suggest that most proficiencies be impossible whilst in clothing. Caressing would be possible but with a penalty of –2 to –6 based on thickness of clothing (impossible on opponents wearing armour). Some rules for time spent removing clothing, or unbuckling essential areas, would be appreciated from the team at large. Perhaps 3e armour style: Don, Remove, Remove Hastily (:D). 4) You’ve somewhat omitted any calculations featuring satisfaction for men. Whilst they cannot sustain quite so many Climaxed states, their DC is significantly lower, hence each orgasm gives more satisfaction tha a woman, given identical rolls. I (roughly) assume this works out to be pretty much on a level with women. 5) My personal opinion on the matter is that it is fine – 3e features an eventual shift of balance from defence winning to offence winning as levels progress (to offset higher hit points somewhat), and this is only kept in accordance. However, if anyone has complaints or would like to suggest an alternative system, fire away. 6) Hmmm… +2. And the system, may I add, is absolutely fantastic. I couldn’t have managed anything near as good myself. To address your other point, we will, of course, require a little good sense where DMs are concerned – Caress (breasts) will have little effect on a male partner, if any. A brief note asking DMs to exercise a little sensibility would not go amiss where proficiencies are concerned. Anyways, enough from the answer guy for now – I’m off to type up a few notes on kinks. Cheers, DbS [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top