Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sorn" data-source="post: 810865" data-attributes="member: 3097">Still here. Worked has crept up to me again and made a vicious sneak attack. Anyway... re: Kolvar's thread... look at the date. That's my guess. If that is not the case, could someone check up on him and make sure he's alright? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> Spells:I think we should just add them to the existing spell lists. I don't really care for custom spell lists for PrC's. The nice thing about d20 is its modular nature. If I want to, I can use spells from all kinds of sources. However, quite a few times Spell X would make a lot of sense for Class Y's custom spell list, but unfortunately the two publishers don't know about each other's spells/classes. So, you have to go through the spells with a fine-toothed comb and hope your GM let's you add Spell X to your list. IMO, PrC's that grant spells should only be accesible for people who can already cast (and they should get a +1 caster level at regular intervals instead of a custom progression). If we end up with PrC's that should be better with certain spells, we can give out a free Spell Focus feat in the appropriate school or simply give the class a bonus with certain spell subtypes.Source Topics:Your suggestions all sound good. Maybe go light on the essays...  things like that can derail fairly easy into something dry or controversial.</blockquote>

Verification