Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bastoche" data-source="post: 811041" data-attributes="member: 306">I forgot to mention that there could be one soft focus list and one hard focus list.But still, most spells if not all spells in the player's handbook has direction conscequences on combat mechanics. Why should it be any other way for the sex spells.My point is that most sensual spells will directly affect the hard focus rules mechanics. From that point of view, they would be better suited for a hard focus campaign. I think soft focus spells are already covered by new uses of old spells. I could think of transmutation spells and enchantment spells for instance.I conceed your point for both paladins and new arcane spell list. I was thinking about it at the same time I wrote my previous post but kept it there just for ideas.I personnaly would not be tempted to use sensual spells in a soft focus campaign.  And I also think that hard focus spells would most probably override any soft focus spells.I'm not quite sure how spells should be thought of for GUCK, but I think they're better suited for hard focus. At least, that's what I would do with them anyway. I would not be tempted to play a hard focus game where sex is not the main theme, therefore sensual prestige class would rather be the goal of character development, somehow. There wouldn't be as many fights in such a campaign as there would be sex intercourse between the characters and the NPCs.Am I wrong when I assume that hard focus rules are intended for a highly sex themed campaign or is it just a more detailed way to rule a sideline?</blockquote>

Verification