Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="VVrayven" data-source="post: 813898" data-attributes="member: 9950">I said I agreed and changed it silly, <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I'll make a sample list though, the general idea is to allow any clothing to fit into one of the four types, Heavy cloaks doesn't automatically mean the garment is heavy, in fact, one big heavy robe is probably LIGHT. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> More power to ya, just trying to cover all angles. ::smiles:: In real life, what good are mutliple partners? Just teasing, but my point is that while some people do get off a lot faster with mutliple people, the stimulation benefit isn't that great. (if they have a kink for it that's another +2 to +4 though). +2 syngery on an even arousal (we are changing that, if you hit their current condition, you get the +2), is pretty signifigant. Remember, the system is balanced around common folk, not epic heroes. +2 might not mean much if you have a +24, but if you are a normal jow with a +4, your chances with a helping hand from a partner increased the chance to peak her from 15% to 25%. If you have a threesome and she helps herself too that's a 35% chance. It isn't good for the gratification, but it is good for success.I see no reason to put a cap on the number of possible partners, after all, they WILL RUN OUT of prof to use. A girl could be penetrated only one (her giving oral can't help her out, and recieving sodomy doesn't give pleasure at the moment by the rules). One other person could use Caress on her breats, she could masturbate herself, that's three. After that you start running out of options... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Ah. True, in the example they don't. However, if the guy is concerned with helping her with her orgasm, two people are FAR better than one. IF one person is rolling against a DC 20 and they each have a +3, they have a 90% to fail the roll. However, the odds of BOTH of them failing are only 81%. If they had a third partner, the chance of failing becomes 72%. So by the odds, having more people obviously helps, but it doesn't neccessarily add an outstanding bonus. And it shouldn't. This is just they way multiple checks CAN be made, more isn't ALWAYS better. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Hope that helps, Asra. Sorry if I was unclear, but it's late for me and I'm really sleepy. Bedtime. <yawn and waves></blockquote>

Verification