Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psyckosama" data-source="post: 836793" data-attributes="member: 9184">That because the old rules set was a damn funny read, and fun to snicker at! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />My POV on what the GUCK should become is more then just a set of rules for having sex. There are some major areas that are skimed over in most books, seduction, courtship, and reproduction. I feel it is 120% within the flavor of the GUCK to handle these issues to some degree.The reason I posted my system is because it is simple.The problems you noted, they can be fixed. The current modifiers are semi-temporary. It needs polish. For example the "fertility magic" entry I gave is really just a momentary place holder. The discriptors I gave could easly be removed and incorporated into a standard spell.Personally I just don't like the idea of rolling everytime they have sex. It slows down the *ahem* action and doesn't account for the fact that it can logically be guessed that players that do it useing the GUCK rules (like a married couple) would also do it "off screen" like when they are inbetween addventures, when the DM glazes over the long voyage to where ever, or other times.Before anyone mentions that you should not consider the PCs sexuially active unless it's RPed out, I just want to mention that atleast I feel that the periods of time that are covered by the adventures are exceptional moments in the characters life, not the norm.  I'll give an example of my opinion.Bill the Fighter might spend lots of time trudging through god-forsaken pits for fame, forture, and to impressed his lover, Linda the Mage, but not all that time. They probelly spend more time traveling to the dungeon or relaxing in their keep/country villa/ townhouse/ect then they actually do during the crawl. And while they may enjoy the ocasional bout of kinky dungeon luvin' chances are most of their intimate activity will be during those long road trips or at home.I know the above is a simplification but I think you can get the basic idea.Hmmm... It has potential but needs work. I agree with Sorn on most of his points and would like to add the idea that which stat is reduced is random and only one is reduced per cycle. Pregnant woman should also be encumbered as the weight of the baby should count toward their carry weight.his armor check penelty on the otherhand is too great IMHO. I think it should be repersented by the decrease in dex, a penalty to worn (nonmagical) armor, and maybe a modifier that it is easier to critical against a pregnant woman.</blockquote>

Verification