Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Death By Surfeit" data-source="post: 866157" data-attributes="member: 8646"><p><strong>New topic soon enough....</strong></p><p></p><p>Wotcher,</p><p></p><p>Thankyou for the contributions from the peanut gallery; it’s nice to be kept on one’s toes.</p><p></p><p>Alzrius: I cannot speak for everyone on matters of policy, but I’ll do my best to express the majority sentiment. This is a community effort, and as such the mechanics are treated as OGC as and when they are finished. We have no current plans to publish officially, but it is certainly an option; upon completion, we would like to gauge public interest, and consider doing a published copy should the means become available.</p><p></p><p>Hermaphrodism: Not too much of an outstanding issue – the majority is common sense. If necessary, I can compile a few rules here and there; I should think the area best covered by a sidebar in the section describing sexuality, and will devote my mind to it when the time comes.</p><p></p><p>Java girl: Thankyou for your extended java delvings; they have resolved a lot of the probability questions I had. The balance issues are pretty well sorted out (and I like your resist DCs), and although men fare better at lower levels and women better at higher ones, this is all too realistic.</p><p></p><p>Change to tables: drop from Aroused to nothing is possible only on a critical failure, followed by a fail on the ‘resist Arousal drop’ DC table as done by VVrayven.</p><p></p><p>The singular problem outstanding, in my opinion at least, is duration. I would like to propose a simple enough solution: ALL Arousal checks are assumed to take 1 full minute to do. In the scope of conventional sex, matters are thus worked out at the end of every minute. Checks CAN be made as a full-round action, but at a –2 penalty.</p><p></p><p>Whaddaya think? It’s a rather primitive solution, but seems workable, and is the only one to spring to mind.</p><p></p><p>Comments on the above, any other outstanding issues, or expressions of approval for current system, please post. A new topic will be started very soon, but the core mechanics will have to be finalised first. That’s it from me for now.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Death By Surfeit, post: 866157, member: 8646"] [b]New topic soon enough....[/b] Wotcher, Thankyou for the contributions from the peanut gallery; it’s nice to be kept on one’s toes. Alzrius: I cannot speak for everyone on matters of policy, but I’ll do my best to express the majority sentiment. This is a community effort, and as such the mechanics are treated as OGC as and when they are finished. We have no current plans to publish officially, but it is certainly an option; upon completion, we would like to gauge public interest, and consider doing a published copy should the means become available. Hermaphrodism: Not too much of an outstanding issue – the majority is common sense. If necessary, I can compile a few rules here and there; I should think the area best covered by a sidebar in the section describing sexuality, and will devote my mind to it when the time comes. Java girl: Thankyou for your extended java delvings; they have resolved a lot of the probability questions I had. The balance issues are pretty well sorted out (and I like your resist DCs), and although men fare better at lower levels and women better at higher ones, this is all too realistic. Change to tables: drop from Aroused to nothing is possible only on a critical failure, followed by a fail on the ‘resist Arousal drop’ DC table as done by VVrayven. The singular problem outstanding, in my opinion at least, is duration. I would like to propose a simple enough solution: ALL Arousal checks are assumed to take 1 full minute to do. In the scope of conventional sex, matters are thus worked out at the end of every minute. Checks CAN be made as a full-round action, but at a –2 penalty. Whaddaya think? It’s a rather primitive solution, but seems workable, and is the only one to spring to mind. Comments on the above, any other outstanding issues, or expressions of approval for current system, please post. A new topic will be started very soon, but the core mechanics will have to be finalised first. That’s it from me for now. Cheers, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top