Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VVrayven" data-source="post: 871741" data-attributes="member: 9950"><p>Wow. Lots of stuff to clarify. I guess we need even clearer and more concise text with a lot more examples.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Yes, you get one prof for each rank you have in the skill. I'll clear up the language here.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Soft focus rules (which is our quick resolution system) allows for a situation similar to taking 10 or 20 and works well, plus we indicate that you don't ALWAYS need to roll for stuff (or will in the mechanics opening). That aside, men may always be able to climax, but about one third of all women can't or have a lot of trouble when they masturbate. And, if you roll enough (say ten minutes, ten rolls) even a rank 0 person is 50% likely to hit their DC (which are all below 20). Hmmm except that with Masturbation +2... Rank zero women find it impossible without circumstantial help. (I'll look into this, DbS ideas?, maybe a KNOW YOURSELF bonus?)</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sure. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>This is a point of contention for me at the moment. When we make the NC rules I'll get back to this. My gut says that yes, this should be possible and it is always a possibility that someone else is doing the grappling.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>You can. You can't make more than one one same partner or exceed your limit. I'll see if I can clear these lines up.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Well... Actually they are still there, you just can't see them. What happens for instance if you get a DC 2 on a female partner that is peaked? Hmmm? Well she drops to Aroused is what happens. I do need to clarify this though.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Yes there will be. They will be places in the feats section and spells sections respectively. No, common people cannot change these DCs. There are also some Carnal Arts that will aid in this area when we get back around to fixing them for v1.4.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I think the "Avoid Total Arousal Loss" table is quite generous enough and I don't anticipate ANY bonuses being used with it. It is a Fort save because all physical arousal is tied to the body (but it is a point I will look at). This mechanic will almost NEVER be used and it is really in there to fix a small problem in the mechanics. I will clarify the text though.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>You speak of a flavor text issue. Climax does not mean ONE orgasm. Nor does it imply many. One minute of climax does not imply the orgasm lasted a minute, merely the status condition did. All of that is just flavor text. Climax means a pleasurable state in which a climax or climax-like event occured. If a woman had 3 consecutive climax minutes, it might mean see just had three orgasms one minute apart or perhaps she had thirty very quick ones. The end result is all flavor and doesn't effect the system at all. And yes, the results of a Prowess check last a full ten rounds, however, peaked will end after the next round if it is not maintained (see the definition of peaked). The prowess effects length were never a point of contention, only the length of the time segement used.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>DM discression. Typically it means the session is over with. If I make love for an hour then cuddled for twenty minues only to start again, I'd call that one session. If I slept over night, I'd call the night and day two different ones.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>A minor typo, it should be minutes. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Nope. There is no way to scale it right. So, no save.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Not really, but the language is unclear. I'll see what I can do.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Sure. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Right. You can't! However, you can induce the Mental Arousal: Horny which in turn can physically arouse you all on it's own...</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Hmm perhaps. I'm not confused on it, perhaps: Rules for using exotic proficiences are covered below. Not all Basic Prowess techniques have equal application – some are best used to initially Arouse a partner.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Ah-hah! No here is a good idea brewing. Okay, you are wrong, you do take specific profs like (lap dance) and the like, was this unclear above? However, the reason you can't switch is based on the fact that if you are using basic techs, then the DC modifiers change from say Masturbation to Intercourse! However, I believe you should be able to switch between exotic profs without penalty. I'll add it to the list of differences section.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>You are wrong, you have to take specific profs, but this is a point of debate with DbS, I'll get back to you.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I'll fix the language.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>See above. Well, after all this shredding I think I need to rewrite some stuff for clarity. I'll get 1.4a out today and we'll work from there...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VVrayven, post: 871741, member: 9950"] Wow. Lots of stuff to clarify. I guess we need even clearer and more concise text with a lot more examples. Yes, you get one prof for each rank you have in the skill. I'll clear up the language here. Soft focus rules (which is our quick resolution system) allows for a situation similar to taking 10 or 20 and works well, plus we indicate that you don't ALWAYS need to roll for stuff (or will in the mechanics opening). That aside, men may always be able to climax, but about one third of all women can't or have a lot of trouble when they masturbate. And, if you roll enough (say ten minutes, ten rolls) even a rank 0 person is 50% likely to hit their DC (which are all below 20). Hmmm except that with Masturbation +2... Rank zero women find it impossible without circumstantial help. (I'll look into this, DbS ideas?, maybe a KNOW YOURSELF bonus?) Sure. ;) This is a point of contention for me at the moment. When we make the NC rules I'll get back to this. My gut says that yes, this should be possible and it is always a possibility that someone else is doing the grappling. You can. You can't make more than one one same partner or exceed your limit. I'll see if I can clear these lines up. Well... Actually they are still there, you just can't see them. What happens for instance if you get a DC 2 on a female partner that is peaked? Hmmm? Well she drops to Aroused is what happens. I do need to clarify this though. Yes there will be. They will be places in the feats section and spells sections respectively. No, common people cannot change these DCs. There are also some Carnal Arts that will aid in this area when we get back around to fixing them for v1.4. I think the "Avoid Total Arousal Loss" table is quite generous enough and I don't anticipate ANY bonuses being used with it. It is a Fort save because all physical arousal is tied to the body (but it is a point I will look at). This mechanic will almost NEVER be used and it is really in there to fix a small problem in the mechanics. I will clarify the text though. You speak of a flavor text issue. Climax does not mean ONE orgasm. Nor does it imply many. One minute of climax does not imply the orgasm lasted a minute, merely the status condition did. All of that is just flavor text. Climax means a pleasurable state in which a climax or climax-like event occured. If a woman had 3 consecutive climax minutes, it might mean see just had three orgasms one minute apart or perhaps she had thirty very quick ones. The end result is all flavor and doesn't effect the system at all. And yes, the results of a Prowess check last a full ten rounds, however, peaked will end after the next round if it is not maintained (see the definition of peaked). The prowess effects length were never a point of contention, only the length of the time segement used. DM discression. Typically it means the session is over with. If I make love for an hour then cuddled for twenty minues only to start again, I'd call that one session. If I slept over night, I'd call the night and day two different ones. A minor typo, it should be minutes. ;) Nope. There is no way to scale it right. So, no save. Not really, but the language is unclear. I'll see what I can do. Sure. ;) Right. You can't! However, you can induce the Mental Arousal: Horny which in turn can physically arouse you all on it's own... Hmm perhaps. I'm not confused on it, perhaps: Rules for using exotic proficiences are covered below. Not all Basic Prowess techniques have equal application – some are best used to initially Arouse a partner. Ah-hah! No here is a good idea brewing. Okay, you are wrong, you do take specific profs like (lap dance) and the like, was this unclear above? However, the reason you can't switch is based on the fact that if you are using basic techs, then the DC modifiers change from say Masturbation to Intercourse! However, I believe you should be able to switch between exotic profs without penalty. I'll add it to the list of differences section. You are wrong, you have to take specific profs, but this is a point of debate with DbS, I'll get back to you. I'll fix the language. See above. Well, after all this shredding I think I need to rewrite some stuff for clarity. I'll get 1.4a out today and we'll work from there... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK Development Forum again
Top