Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="VVrayven" data-source="post: 878640" data-attributes="member: 9950">Actually, I don't believe their were tech suitability mods in the first one either. And it isn't the mental is secondary. Mental is FAR more powerful than physicsal and as such is much harder to induce. Physical arousal is eaiser and the variety of techs change the way it is used dramatically, hence why orgasm through a body massage is harder... Mental arousal is on the other hand, different for each person. A lapdance isn't neccessarily any better at moving someone from horny to lustful than say pillow talk. None of these can be classified in such ways. That is why they always have (and will) never have tech suitability mods. It doesn't need etc. If WE want to edit it for rear positions or sodomy that pleasures both partners, it is far easier this way. AND, it's nice to keep penatrative locked in to those positions that are ONLY intercourse. That way if we need to specifiy something that "only works on penetrative techs" the statement is much eaiser, since we always know what we are refering to. Agreed. If you will notice, ALL of the modifiers mentioned in the text are in the table. The table is a quick reference. Hence I could just as easiliy say that the exhausted status condition says there is a penalty and it is in the circumstance chart so it should be counted twice. I see no reason to not state it twice, in fact, I think it is neccessary for clarity.</blockquote>

Verification