Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 891996" data-attributes="member: 8461">#1 sounds fine to me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Number two could use some minor clarification, I think. Its that, when in a state of mental arousal, you may willingly become physically aroused at will? That strikes me as slightly odd...also, I assume that once you do become physically aroused that way, you can't then stop at will also, right? That said, this sounds good otherwise.I agree that this does seem more natural. Good call!The difficulty here is that such a name needs to be indicative of the fact that this is a penetrative act, just with other body parts than vaginally. That's pretty specific. I suggest Fetish Penetration, but there probably is a better name out there.That said, I again want to mention that I think that the "recipient only" part is a bad idea. I know I'm kicking a dead horse here, but this raises some problems that haven't yet been dealt with. Namely that the person making the penetration will then never need to have ranks in these proficiencies (unless they also have this done to them), and worse, it means that they are able to do this sex act for "free" as it were, since they don't need to make Prowess rolls for it. This also denies completely that the recipient can be pleasured from NVI, which isn't always the case.</blockquote>

Verification