Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brevdravis" data-source="post: 900660" data-attributes="member: 11994"><p><strong>Advanced mechanics question</strong></p><p></p><p>Okay, now that I know this board isn't dead, (Thanks for the welcome Sorn!) I'll drop in some more quick questions....</p><p></p><p>With regards to advanced mechanics....</p><p></p><p>1. With regards to multiple partners, is there a plan for "doubling-up" on someone. For example, we have the penalties for handling making checks on two people. I'm wondering if the plan is to handle two people making checks on the same person by adding either a synergy bonus, or just to use the same rules that d20 normally uses for two people (or more....<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ) combining actions.</p><p></p><p>The way I'm seeing it, the person in the "middle" should be able to have the multiple checks made upon them with no problem, but if you want to make checks back.... Then I think that the standard rules handle it pretty well with the exception of some of the penetrative skills. Without getting too graphic, I think the "just lie there" rules should apply, unless the character is actively trying to please everybody, and then of course the standard penalties should apply.</p><p></p><p>Hentai addendum: Regarding multiple partners for those with multiple appendages, I think that the existing "Multi-dexterity" feat could be slightly expanded to cover the situation...</p><p></p><p>2. NC (non consensual situations). If we're going for a complete guide, we need to cover it (And lets be honest, it is a fantasy novel archetype). Is there a rough draft in the making for this yet? If not, who's covering it?</p><p></p><p>Thanks, have fun with my queries, and feel free to rip them apart.....</p><p></p><p>Stuart</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brevdravis, post: 900660, member: 11994"] [b]Advanced mechanics question[/b] Okay, now that I know this board isn't dead, (Thanks for the welcome Sorn!) I'll drop in some more quick questions.... With regards to advanced mechanics.... 1. With regards to multiple partners, is there a plan for "doubling-up" on someone. For example, we have the penalties for handling making checks on two people. I'm wondering if the plan is to handle two people making checks on the same person by adding either a synergy bonus, or just to use the same rules that d20 normally uses for two people (or more....;) ) combining actions. The way I'm seeing it, the person in the "middle" should be able to have the multiple checks made upon them with no problem, but if you want to make checks back.... Then I think that the standard rules handle it pretty well with the exception of some of the penetrative skills. Without getting too graphic, I think the "just lie there" rules should apply, unless the character is actively trying to please everybody, and then of course the standard penalties should apply. Hentai addendum: Regarding multiple partners for those with multiple appendages, I think that the existing "Multi-dexterity" feat could be slightly expanded to cover the situation... 2. NC (non consensual situations). If we're going for a complete guide, we need to cover it (And lets be honest, it is a fantasy novel archetype). Is there a rough draft in the making for this yet? If not, who's covering it? Thanks, have fun with my queries, and feel free to rip them apart..... Stuart [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
Top