Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brevdravis" data-source="post: 901777" data-attributes="member: 11994"><p><strong>Thanks for the answers</strong></p><p></p><p>Thanks a lot for pointing out those sections of the guide that I missed. </p><p></p><p>(Not that I'm trying to nitpick here.... buuuut...a few ideas....)</p><p></p><p>1. With regards to the multiple partners rule, I think that the bonus might be a little low, after all, the fact that it's two people giving full attention instead of one splitting their attention should be reflected. I'm thinking a bonus based on the degree the check was made by...</p><p></p><p>I.e. If you have a check that just maintains, the +2 should apply, but if the second check would actually raise the arousal level, I'm thinking at least a +5, possibly more depending on the check roll.</p><p></p><p>2. Thanks for pointing out the NC rule. However, I think that needs a little fleshing out, since it's pretty barren. Just a quick thought, (Could offend, so I apologize in advance) but IMHO there are five ways that the situation could be handled. (Sidebars, maybe...)</p><p></p><p>A. Doesn't exist in the world. (All relationships are consensual and shame on you for even thinking otherwise!) - Something like this would be for those who want to include sex but don't want to include the more unpleasant parts of human nature.</p><p></p><p>B. Reality - Soft focus. (It's an unpleasant fact of life and is handled off screen with a quick combat followed by a soft-focus roll for the attacker.) - For those who want it in the game but don't want the total experience.</p><p></p><p>C. Reality - Hard Focus. (It's an unpleasant reality that happens in the world. Is done "on screen" with various grapple checks, followed by proficiency checks. Severe penalties would be present for the attacker to even attempt to pleasure the victim. 95+% of the time the only one who enjoys the situation is the attacker.) - For those who want gritty reality.</p><p></p><p>D. Fantasy - Soft focus. (Ranges from unpleasant to fantasy situations. A quick grapple roll followed by the quick proficiency check.) - For those who want to have those lovely little "bodice-ripper" scenes in their game, but want to avoid the nitty-gritty.</p><p></p><p>E. Fantasy - Hard Focus. (Same as the soft focus, except the fantasy scene is more played out with specific checks for a few things. Penalties are much lighter, and the emphasis is on attempts to bring pleasure rather than the frightening reality.) - For those of , Oh the hell with it, I'll admit it, it's for me. There, ya happy?</p><p></p><p>This is just a quick outline, the soft focus would be a quick roll similar to what we have, and I think the only one that would need rules would be the hard focus.</p><p></p><p>Just rambling off-topic.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for your time.</p><p></p><p>Stuart</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brevdravis, post: 901777, member: 11994"] [b]Thanks for the answers[/b] Thanks a lot for pointing out those sections of the guide that I missed. (Not that I'm trying to nitpick here.... buuuut...a few ideas....) 1. With regards to the multiple partners rule, I think that the bonus might be a little low, after all, the fact that it's two people giving full attention instead of one splitting their attention should be reflected. I'm thinking a bonus based on the degree the check was made by... I.e. If you have a check that just maintains, the +2 should apply, but if the second check would actually raise the arousal level, I'm thinking at least a +5, possibly more depending on the check roll. 2. Thanks for pointing out the NC rule. However, I think that needs a little fleshing out, since it's pretty barren. Just a quick thought, (Could offend, so I apologize in advance) but IMHO there are five ways that the situation could be handled. (Sidebars, maybe...) A. Doesn't exist in the world. (All relationships are consensual and shame on you for even thinking otherwise!) - Something like this would be for those who want to include sex but don't want to include the more unpleasant parts of human nature. B. Reality - Soft focus. (It's an unpleasant fact of life and is handled off screen with a quick combat followed by a soft-focus roll for the attacker.) - For those who want it in the game but don't want the total experience. C. Reality - Hard Focus. (It's an unpleasant reality that happens in the world. Is done "on screen" with various grapple checks, followed by proficiency checks. Severe penalties would be present for the attacker to even attempt to pleasure the victim. 95+% of the time the only one who enjoys the situation is the attacker.) - For those who want gritty reality. D. Fantasy - Soft focus. (Ranges from unpleasant to fantasy situations. A quick grapple roll followed by the quick proficiency check.) - For those who want to have those lovely little "bodice-ripper" scenes in their game, but want to avoid the nitty-gritty. E. Fantasy - Hard Focus. (Same as the soft focus, except the fantasy scene is more played out with specific checks for a few things. Penalties are much lighter, and the emphasis is on attempts to bring pleasure rather than the frightening reality.) - For those of , Oh the hell with it, I'll admit it, it's for me. There, ya happy? This is just a quick outline, the soft focus would be a quick roll similar to what we have, and I think the only one that would need rules would be the hard focus. Just rambling off-topic. Thanks for your time. Stuart [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
Top