Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 902222" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>I'm not sure...the description for being Delerious says, "<em>A Delirious character is beyond the reach of the world and lost in a private world of sensuality, devoid of the will to do anything but satisfy an all-consuming desire for base pleasure. This is not by any means a natural state - only through the machinations of powerful enchantments or by having their Wisdom reduced to 3 or lower whilst aroused can a character enter this state.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Unless the character succeeds in a Will save (DC 30) each round, they are considered Helpless, incapable of taking any action beyond seeking out the nearest source of sexual relief and indulging themselves They lack the awareness to make seduction attempts, instead throwing themselves at whatever looks most satisfying - sexual alignment plays a role where there is a choice of partners, but beyond that a Delirious character will consent to pretty much anything and anyone.</em>"</p><p></p><p>Given that, she would probably snap out of it when she recovers her Wis (which won't go down since she can't reach orgasm) or when the spell ends. Ergo, she won't die of exposure.</p><p></p><p>That said, the problem of a woman who is Delerious not being able to reach orgasm from masterbating doesn't seem so terribly wrong here; It'd seem to make sense that she'd try desperately to find someone, anyone, to get her off, and if alone would suffer for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The system we're developing seems to be changing and revising a bit too much, so for that reason I think that Delerious is fine as it is. Giving a bonus doesn't seem quite right, since you'd think that someone whose become a sex-crazed maniac wouldn't suddenly become even more proficient in touching someone just the right way. In essence, being that aroused sends your technique to hell, it doesn't make it better.</p><p></p><p>As to being immune to Wis damage...they'd only lose consciousness if they were in this state due to their Wis being below three. At that point, they'd have their Wis go to zero and be unconscious for a day later, when they'd gain back 1 point and wake up. This seems about normal for someone who already had enough orgasms to drive their Wisdom that low to begin with.</p><p></p><p>Not sure what you mean by SDed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps a caveat that characters who engage in sex for a number of rounds equal to their Con score become Fatigued, or something along those lines?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 902222, member: 8461"] I'm not sure...the description for being Delerious says, "[I]A Delirious character is beyond the reach of the world and lost in a private world of sensuality, devoid of the will to do anything but satisfy an all-consuming desire for base pleasure. This is not by any means a natural state - only through the machinations of powerful enchantments or by having their Wisdom reduced to 3 or lower whilst aroused can a character enter this state. Unless the character succeeds in a Will save (DC 30) each round, they are considered Helpless, incapable of taking any action beyond seeking out the nearest source of sexual relief and indulging themselves They lack the awareness to make seduction attempts, instead throwing themselves at whatever looks most satisfying - sexual alignment plays a role where there is a choice of partners, but beyond that a Delirious character will consent to pretty much anything and anyone.[/I]" Given that, she would probably snap out of it when she recovers her Wis (which won't go down since she can't reach orgasm) or when the spell ends. Ergo, she won't die of exposure. That said, the problem of a woman who is Delerious not being able to reach orgasm from masterbating doesn't seem so terribly wrong here; It'd seem to make sense that she'd try desperately to find someone, anyone, to get her off, and if alone would suffer for it. The system we're developing seems to be changing and revising a bit too much, so for that reason I think that Delerious is fine as it is. Giving a bonus doesn't seem quite right, since you'd think that someone whose become a sex-crazed maniac wouldn't suddenly become even more proficient in touching someone just the right way. In essence, being that aroused sends your technique to hell, it doesn't make it better. As to being immune to Wis damage...they'd only lose consciousness if they were in this state due to their Wis being below three. At that point, they'd have their Wis go to zero and be unconscious for a day later, when they'd gain back 1 point and wake up. This seems about normal for someone who already had enough orgasms to drive their Wisdom that low to begin with. Not sure what you mean by SDed. Perhaps a caveat that characters who engage in sex for a number of rounds equal to their Con score become Fatigued, or something along those lines? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
Top