Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 945023" data-attributes="member: 8439">can one assume this follows the old ranger rule of not picking your own race? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I'm confused by these. Is this a subset of voyerism? Since sexual orintation is handled in a seperate system, I'm not sure how having either of these as a fetish makes sense... (if you're a lesbain, can you have 'straight people' as a fetish?)I think that the application note can be extended to include allignment issues and thus cut the above list down to two generic terms, like "pain" and "domination." I'm thinking something like: "Allignment will also play a role in the application of kinks and frets. A 'good' PC who rolls randomly for domination would be presumed to be either a top or a bottom and seeks out consenting partners for, well, roleplaying... an evil character who rolls for pain would be interpreted very differently."My point is that the fundemental difference between a kink and a crime is consent. And whether one desires consent in their sexual relationships seem to me to be a pretty basic allignment issue. So while I was orriginally in favor of spelling out the differences, your note made me rethink that...Kahuna burger</blockquote>