Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 987281" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p><strong>Re: Those who can, trip.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only eight out of eighteen proposed. Here's hoping most of those others make it!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Maybe its just me, but I don't see a strong need for these descriptors at all. A spell that induces physical arousal isn't something I think needs its own descriptor, since we lay out elsewhere the levels of physical arousal and what they entail. If the spell does cause physical arousal, there really won't be any way to not say that in the description anyway. I could maybe see this descriptor, but it still seems kinda iffy to me.</p><p></p><p>The second one, Libido-Affecting, I really think is superfluous. There is no reason for this to not be just the Mind-Affecting descriptor. The only instance where this would apply where Mind-Affecting wouldn't is where a creature has a mind but no sexual alignment...something that hasn't been fleshed out at all yet.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Frigid Touch" should have the first letter of each word capitalized (yeah I'm nitpicking...someone has to do it).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Spell name capitalization again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah, you reveal a British heritage, eh DbS? As far as I know, there is no "u" in "flavor" the way most people spell it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Capitalization of spell names again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm going to be honest and say I liked the name "Slap" better, though "Mage Slap" would be fine (though it sounds like a class-specific variant of the bitch slap). Simply put, slapping is more stereotypical; people who make sexual advances that get rejected tend to get slapped, not backhanded.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I wonder if "Magic Fingers" wouldn't be a better name...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Spell name capitalization again.</p><p></p><p>All in all though, I think this looks pretty nice. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 987281, member: 8461"] [b]Re: Those who can, trip.[/b] Only eight out of eighteen proposed. Here's hoping most of those others make it! Maybe its just me, but I don't see a strong need for these descriptors at all. A spell that induces physical arousal isn't something I think needs its own descriptor, since we lay out elsewhere the levels of physical arousal and what they entail. If the spell does cause physical arousal, there really won't be any way to not say that in the description anyway. I could maybe see this descriptor, but it still seems kinda iffy to me. The second one, Libido-Affecting, I really think is superfluous. There is no reason for this to not be just the Mind-Affecting descriptor. The only instance where this would apply where Mind-Affecting wouldn't is where a creature has a mind but no sexual alignment...something that hasn't been fleshed out at all yet. "Frigid Touch" should have the first letter of each word capitalized (yeah I'm nitpicking...someone has to do it). Spell name capitalization again. Ah, you reveal a British heritage, eh DbS? As far as I know, there is no "u" in "flavor" the way most people spell it. Capitalization of spell names again. I'm going to be honest and say I liked the name "Slap" better, though "Mage Slap" would be fine (though it sounds like a class-specific variant of the bitch slap). Simply put, slapping is more stereotypical; people who make sexual advances that get rejected tend to get slapped, not backhanded. I wonder if "Magic Fingers" wouldn't be a better name... Spell name capitalization again. All in all though, I think this looks pretty nice. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
Top
