Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Death By Surfeit" data-source="post: 989233" data-attributes="member: 8646">Well said, Sorn, and damn you for making the post I had prepared irrelevant. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Oh, and regarding your comments Alzrius:• Arousal and Libido-Affecting are included as descriptors as I thought certain spells and items would offer bonuses specifically to resisting them. If this is peripheral, they may be removed with little ado.• English spelling looks better.• ‘Mage Backhand’ and ‘Mage Fingers’ were designed as puns on ‘Mage Hand’. I agree, though, that ‘Mage Backhand’ is too long-winded. ‘Mage Slap’ is a worthy substitute.• Yes, only eight of eighteen. Considering those that needed adjustment, those balanced above 1st level, and those that have been merged I don’t think it’s too bad a turnout. I would like to declare now that ideas for spells are just that, and whilst it would be nice to have every concept catered for, it is simply not practical. Besides, we’re theoretically editing, and condensing material is part of the job. If people would like to see spells I’ve left out featured, say so.• Thanks for the nitpicking. It's not a glamorous job, but it's necessary.I’ve been working on compiling the rules modifications and additions we’ve made over the last month or so, with some success. When the ‘Adult: GUCK development forum IV’ topic is posted, a copy of the GUCK Full Mechanics (v2.0) will be posted with it. It includes the soft focus rules, sexual alignment, kinks, conception, and interbreeding rules, besides a whole host of rewordings, clarifications and spelling corrections too numerous to count.Ideally, the pregnancy and childbirth rules would also make an appearance, but the board seems to have got distracted, and I along with them. Congratulations to Sorn for getting us back on track. Whilst it is tempting to skip dreary mechanics discussions and go on to brainstorming clever spells, the rules vacuum must be addressed, and the board must pull together to that end.I’ve come up with some provisional rules, the ones seen on the site, but they are somewhat sketchy and I would very much like to see everyone else’s ideas. If you could post whatever you can come up with, the section should be complete in no time.Cheers,DbS</blockquote>

Verification