Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 989295" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>Some of my initial reactions to Chapter 5's Pregnancy & Childbirth sections:</p><p></p><p>Ditch the monthly check. It doesn't seem to fit well for a plethora of reasons. For one, the amount of modifiers to be calculated is unwieldy. It also doesn't seem to address that a woman could have plenty of sex with multiple people in a month, which means things like Paternal Modifiers become somewhat complex, since you have to add in all the modifiers for all the males she's slept with over a month. Likewise, there is no way in that system to track which male is then the father of the child. It would also make little sense that a woman could, under this system, sleep with someone and not be pregnant from it until a month later.</p><p></p><p>The conception threat roll method is, IMHO, much better. It will require us to go through the monster section and list out the fertility of the creatures there, but that's acceptable.</p><p></p><p>Under the actual pregnancy section, the first thing that leapt out at me is that you don't say what kind of check is made against Weakness, Awkwardness, and Exhaustion (though its assumed they're Fort saves).</p><p></p><p>The notation in red there is right in that that way of measuring things will be very hard on commoners. It is, however, incorrect about the Con loss killing her through negative hit points alone, since Con drain won't reduce your hp below 1 hp/hit die. However, that said, it will almost certainly make surviving the birthing damn hard, since commoners will have a very low Con by then. Even if giving birth just deals damage, that alone will kill a lot of them.</p><p></p><p>I recommend that these checks only be made during the beginning of the first, third, fifth, seventh, and ninth stages. The rationale here is that I think the system presented for pregnancy is, in and of itself, a good one, but it is a bit too heavy. This way, halving it (almost), will give commoners an easier time surviving it, but will still make it not too uncommon that women die in childbirth.</p><p></p><p>I'm also thinking that the Weakness part of the checks should be abandoned, since, AFAIK, women may become less graceful and more tired while lugging around a heavy child in their womb, but nothing says they lose physical strength (as opposed to constitution).</p><p></p><p>I'd also suggest a section about how, during pregnancy, every hour after waking the pregnant female is Nauseated for one hour afterwards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 989295, member: 8461"] Some of my initial reactions to Chapter 5's Pregnancy & Childbirth sections: Ditch the monthly check. It doesn't seem to fit well for a plethora of reasons. For one, the amount of modifiers to be calculated is unwieldy. It also doesn't seem to address that a woman could have plenty of sex with multiple people in a month, which means things like Paternal Modifiers become somewhat complex, since you have to add in all the modifiers for all the males she's slept with over a month. Likewise, there is no way in that system to track which male is then the father of the child. It would also make little sense that a woman could, under this system, sleep with someone and not be pregnant from it until a month later. The conception threat roll method is, IMHO, much better. It will require us to go through the monster section and list out the fertility of the creatures there, but that's acceptable. Under the actual pregnancy section, the first thing that leapt out at me is that you don't say what kind of check is made against Weakness, Awkwardness, and Exhaustion (though its assumed they're Fort saves). The notation in red there is right in that that way of measuring things will be very hard on commoners. It is, however, incorrect about the Con loss killing her through negative hit points alone, since Con drain won't reduce your hp below 1 hp/hit die. However, that said, it will almost certainly make surviving the birthing damn hard, since commoners will have a very low Con by then. Even if giving birth just deals damage, that alone will kill a lot of them. I recommend that these checks only be made during the beginning of the first, third, fifth, seventh, and ninth stages. The rationale here is that I think the system presented for pregnancy is, in and of itself, a good one, but it is a bit too heavy. This way, halving it (almost), will give commoners an easier time surviving it, but will still make it not too uncommon that women die in childbirth. I'm also thinking that the Weakness part of the checks should be abandoned, since, AFAIK, women may become less graceful and more tired while lugging around a heavy child in their womb, but nothing says they lose physical strength (as opposed to constitution). I'd also suggest a section about how, during pregnancy, every hour after waking the pregnant female is Nauseated for one hour afterwards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum III
Top