Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum IV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brother Shatterstone" data-source="post: 1077673" data-attributes="member: 13442"><p><strong>Re: Full Mechanics v2.0 - Part III</strong></p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if you guys really want to hear this or not, as I know your way past this development wise but I figured I would toss it out their anyway.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sounds good, but I think one check should be for the mother and another check should be for the baby. As I can tell you my mother had a stillborn but was never in danger. </p><p></p><p>With the way it is now your forcing the mother in to a difficult position and your protecting the baby and in all honesty it should be the baby that's in more danger. If it was really that difficult for the mother in real life the population of humans on this planet would be lower and/or we would be extinct. Mother Nature is setup so that mothers live and offspring dies. This way the mother can have offspring sooner than it would take the bay to develop to full terms and produce their own. Also the baby fortitude save bonus, or lack their of, would place it in more of a graver circumstance. This could also even out the fact that commoners vs. adventure issues that some people think you are having.</p><p></p><p>Anyhow when and if something goes wrong it's more often than not mothers that live and the baby that dies.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry if that sounds morbid... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brother Shatterstone, post: 1077673, member: 13442"] [b]Re: Full Mechanics v2.0 - Part III[/b] I'm not sure if you guys really want to hear this or not, as I know your way past this development wise but I figured I would toss it out their anyway. Sounds good, but I think one check should be for the mother and another check should be for the baby. As I can tell you my mother had a stillborn but was never in danger. With the way it is now your forcing the mother in to a difficult position and your protecting the baby and in all honesty it should be the baby that's in more danger. If it was really that difficult for the mother in real life the population of humans on this planet would be lower and/or we would be extinct. Mother Nature is setup so that mothers live and offspring dies. This way the mother can have offspring sooner than it would take the bay to develop to full terms and produce their own. Also the baby fortitude save bonus, or lack their of, would place it in more of a graver circumstance. This could also even out the fact that commoners vs. adventure issues that some people think you are having. Anyhow when and if something goes wrong it's more often than not mothers that live and the baby that dies. Sorry if that sounds morbid... :eek: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Adult: GUCK development forum IV
Top
