Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tanilen" data-source="post: 173800" data-attributes="member: 2494">Reading through Zelda's list, I find myself agreeing with her on most issues. The problem with these spells isn't so much the intent but the execution (ok, and the names). My biggest beef with them is that there are too many of them that do the same thing basically, but at wildly different spell levels. There should definately be a Seduce Person Spell, and one that induces lust, and one that makes&nbsp; targets orgasm, but we don't need 30 spells to accomplish it!The only thing i can really contribute to the tweaking of the rules side is a lot of the spells make up their own rules as to how the effects are demonstrated. We now have a set of mehanics for how sex works, and also defined states of being, like &quot;aroused,&quot; &quot;Peaked&quot; and &quot;Sexually Delerious.&quot;&nbsp; I think the spells should refer to these for effects, to take advantage of the system we have created and present a seamles, consistant product.And oh yeah, as for the recondite: Thanks to a freindly playtester, I finally got to take one of these babies out for a test drive. =) Fun! A little tweaking rule wise may be in order, but a good monster who can easily overpower most oppenents and defeat them, yet leave lots of ways for the DM to have the PC's survive the encounter. I like it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tanilen, post: 173800, member: 2494"] Reading through Zelda's list, I find myself agreeing with her on most issues. The problem with these spells isn't so much the intent but the execution (ok, and the names). My biggest beef with them is that there are too many of them that do the same thing basically, but at wildly different spell levels. There should definately be a Seduce Person Spell, and one that induces lust, and one that makes targets orgasm, but we don't need 30 spells to accomplish it! The only thing i can really contribute to the tweaking of the rules side is a lot of the spells make up their own rules as to how the effects are demonstrated. We now have a set of mehanics for how sex works, and also defined states of being, like "aroused," "Peaked" and "Sexually Delerious." I think the spells should refer to these for effects, to take advantage of the system we have created and present a seamles, consistant product. And oh yeah, as for the recondite: Thanks to a freindly playtester, I finally got to take one of these babies out for a test drive. =) Fun! A little tweaking rule wise may be in order, but a good monster who can easily overpower most oppenents and defeat them, yet leave lots of ways for the DM to have the PC's survive the encounter. I like it. [/QUOTE]

Verification