Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7033464" data-attributes="member: 37579">I find it amusing there's so much talk of adding complexity back into D&D. It's like the opposite of the Old School Renaissance. Especially since 5e is already pretty damn complicated when you compare it to many other games on the market.  I'll start with this comment and get speculative before discussing points. Mostly focusing on "advanced" ideas rather than revisions (like fixing saving throw math).I'd like to see a more in depth combat rules module for people who want that level of tactical combat. Stances and maneuvers where you trade either the weapon damage die or adding the ability score modifier from the attack in order to perform some special move. For those people who just want combat options on a round-by-round basis. I wouldn't mind seeing a return of monster themes from 4e. Small packages of generic or thematic abilities that can be applied to monsters to shake things up. The biggest complaint regarding 5e at my table is the lack of character tweaking. There's just not as much room to spend building a character. You can't build and optimize away from the table, which is a fun activity for some. But that introduces a lot more power gaming to the system, and makes play much harder for people who don't want to spend 30 minutes to an hour levelling up their character. This just makes me curious. What you have trouble finding?The adventuring vs combat section was initially troublesome for me. But once I realized everything about playing the game that was not directly related to punching dudes in the face was in the "adventuring" section it made more sense. And the index is terrible. It does teach you what terms are being used though (and thus how to find things later) but slows down actual use during play. I recommend sticky tabs. Mark the various chapters on the right side and any sections you regularly consult on the top. You show me a spell unique to a subclass and I'll show you a class feature/ ability that uses spell slots. Anything unique to a class belongs in the class section. Anything in the spells section should be shared between at least two classes. Low level monsters can be plenty tough. Higher CR foes do need a bit of a boost in terms of hp and damage, especially compared to the guidelines in the DMG. But that's a symptom of releasing the books months apart.I often use "bloodied" as a descriptor to denote when a tough monster is below half. For powers that trigger on hp thresholds, it's easy enough to just include that hp number. "When first reduced below 50 hp... " and such. It's a little cleaner as the hp is right there in the text of the ability. The ambiguity is only a problem when not playing with a Dungeon Master. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Funny thing, the rules for Stealth in 4e Essentials are pretty similar to the rules in 5e. The difference is the action requirement, which does make hiding that much more difficult. The firmer rules were paradoxically less forgiving for players. I don't have my books in front of me, but IIRC, you couldn't do something like sneak up behind a distracted creature. But they could be a *little* clearer...I'm happy with the reduced focus on magic items. They were just too damn common in 3e/4e.The buying/selling situation is not that bad. We have the price range. When my players have visited a magic item shop, I've rolled randomly on a table of magical items, found the medium price for an item of that rarity and then randomly adjusted the dice +/-100%. Personally, I'd be happy if my players never visited a magic item shop ever again. Having to come up with what is and is not in stock is always irritating. Really, what I need is not firm prices for magic items but a few sample magic item stores with an inventory.Agreed. And also disagree. I like knowing if something hit and was deflected versus if something missed the creature entirely. It helps my narration. And it made sense with the verisimilitude of 3e, where wizards and such attacked using Dexterity. Now it's just needless complexity. It doesn't come up enough to warrant being on every character sheet. It's usually easy enough to say something is a "hit" if it's 10 + Dex or AC -5. I find having a physical manipulative helps with the memory. And once you get used to giving them out & using them, it becomes easier. I recommend having inspiration dice. I picked up some large sized dice that are 3x the size of normal dice. When someone has inspiration, I hand them that dice, which they roll when using it. That way they remember. But you can use other things, like poker chips or tokens from Campaign Coins. <a href="http://campaigncoins.com/d20-crits-or-fails-coins-copper-10/" target="_blank">http://campaigncoins.com/d20-crits-or-fails-coins-copper-10/</a>There's a couple magic item price documents floating around, but most are pretty arbitrary. Here's one: <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8XAiXpOfz9cMWt1RTBicmpmUDg/view" target="_blank">https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8XAiXpOfz9cMWt1RTBicmpmUDg/view</a>But, they're always going to come down to what the author thinks is important. That document lists a few items as "gamechanging", with one of the most expensive items in the game being the decanter of endless water. Adding new monster abilities is super easy. It's simple to just give them a knockdown attack or special weapon based ability. Such as the few new giant attack options in Storm King's Thunder.I'm always making my skeletons and zombies unique, or giving "subboss" humanoid monsters a little ability or power. Often times pulled from a class because I'm making them on the fly. 4e monsters can also be used for inspiration.</blockquote>

Verification