Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 2439414" data-attributes="member: 5724">Yep. Ben at Bad Axe and I get along nicely and there was nothing concerning suing. It was just a typo for "used".I was going to include the stuff from GT but it would have placed me in a strange printing situation where I'd be "off pages" and have to come up with another 8-16 (I think it is 16 with this printer) pages or face a printing charge for being off. Besides that however, I realized that the GT version only covers the most common SA/SQs and I was going to be adding another 550+ to the list. I don't think anything I could have done would have served more than a base guess as to CR adjustments. Knowing our readers <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> it would have been the 5% of the book that would have generated the most questions and I would have only a "I thought it seemed right" response to most (if not all) of them— I didn't think that would cut it. Given that combination, I decided to omit the CR estimator and simply stress playtesting as the only way to get accurate CRs. Basically it would have cost me more, caused more reader issues, and still have been inaccurate because of the giant scope of BB.joe b.</blockquote>