Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Morrus" data-source="post: 7652949" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>Wizards of the Coast regularly surveys various aspects of the adventure gaming channel; distributors, retailers and consumers to better understand their preferences, concerns, and needs. That data is regularly reviewed and distributed internally to senior management. The contents of this file are excerpts from those sources; the source materials themselves are confidential internal documents and are not available to the public.</p><p>[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]</p><p><strong>Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0</strong></p><p><strong>Release Date: February 07, 2000</strong></p><p></p><p>Summary prepared by:</p><p>Ryan S. Dancey,</p><p>Vice President, Wizards of the Coast;</p><p>Brand Manager, Dungeons & Dragons</p><p></p><p><strong>Permissions:</strong> This file is Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast. This file may be freely redistributed or quoted in whole or part, provided that this attribution remains intact.</p><p></p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Wizards of the Coast regularly surveys various aspects of the adventure gaming channel; distributors, retailers and consumers to better understand their preferences, concerns, and needs. That data is regularly reviewed and distributed internally to senior management. The contents of this file are excerpts from those sources; the source materials themselves are confidential internal documents and are not available to the public. You have my assurances that to the best of my ability, the information presented in this document represents a fair and accurate representation of the data.</p><p></p><p><strong>Sources:</strong> The primary source is a market segmentation study conducted in the summer of 1999. No confidential information provided by non-Wizards companies was used in the preparation of this report.</p><p></p><p><strong>Exclusions: </strong>The internal information gathered by Wizards is considered an important competitive advantage. Therefore, not all the information available to Wizards is incorporated in this document, and there may be areas where substantial, significant information is purposefully not included. An effort has been made to ensure that the absence of any portion of this confidential information would not render the material provided herein inaccurate or invalid.</p><p></p><p><strong>Pokemon Effect: </strong>As this study was conducted just as the Pokemon TCG phenomenon was gathering speed. For this, and several internal reasons, I have elected not to present information on the TCG component of the industry at this time.</p><p></p><p><strong>Updates:</strong> From time to time, I intend to revise and update this file to reflect our ongoing efforts to understand the industry. When an update occurs, the version number of the document will be changed, as will the "release date". Interested parties can write to me at <a href="mailto:ryand@frpg.com">ryand@frpg.com</a> to request an up to date copy of this document.</p><p></p><p><strong>Section 1: The Segmentation Study</strong></p><p></p><p>Since so much of this data is derived from the '99 Segmentation Study, it is important that the reader understand how this data was gathered.</p><p></p><p>For the purpose of the 1999 study, the following methodology was employed:</p><p></p><p>A two phase approach was used to determine information about trading card games (TCGs), role playing games (RPGs) and miniatures wargames (MWG) in the general US population between the ages of 12 and 35. For the rest of this document, this group is referred to as "the marketplace" or "the market", or "the consumers".</p><p></p><p>This age bracket was arbitrarily chosen on the basis of internal analysis regarding the probable target customers for the company's products. We know for certain that there are lots of gamers older than 35, especially for games like Dungeons & Dragons; however, we wanted to keep the study to a manageable size and profile. Perhaps in a few years a more detailed study will be done of the entire population.</p><p></p><p>Information from more than 65,000 people was gathered from a questionnaire sent to more than 20,000 households via a post card survey. This survey was used as a "screener" to create a general profile of the game playing population in the target age range, for the purposes of extrapolating trends to the general population.</p><p></p><p>This "screener" accurately represents the US population as a whole; it is a snapshot of the entire nation and is used to extrapolate trends from more focused surveys to the larger market.</p><p></p><p>A follow up survey was completed by about a thousand respondents from the "screener". The follow up survey is an extensive document with more than 100 questions. The particular individuals chosen to participate in this expanded survey represent the population, as determined by the screener. In other words, the small detailed survey group can be reasonably extrapolated to the larger screener group, and the larger screener group can be logically extrapolated to the public in general. This is a common, standard, and accepted methodology within the market research field.</p><p></p><p>The data from the detailed survey was collated and prepared by the Wizards market Research Department, in conjunction with an external consulting firm. We believe that the data is a fair and accurate representation of the hobby game consumer profile and that it does statistically correlate with the population as a whole in the US for the target age bracket.</p><p></p><p><strong>Section 2: Basic Terms</strong></p><p></p><p>As a part of the detailed survey, the following terms and examples were provided to the respondents:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Term</strong></td><td><strong>Example</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Paper RPGs*</td><td>Dungeons & Dragons</td></tr><tr><td>Card Games</td><td>Bridge, Solitaire, Uno, Poker</td></tr><tr><td>Trading Card Games</td><td>Magic, Pokemon</td></tr><tr><td>Word/ knowledge</td><td>Scrabble, Trivial Pursuit</td></tr><tr><td>Puzzle computer games</td><td>Tetris</td></tr><tr><td>Non-competitive problem solving</td><td>Sim City, Myst</td></tr><tr><td>Puzzle table games</td><td>Jenga, Dominoes</td></tr><tr><td>Class board games</td><td>Chess, Monopoly, Go</td></tr><tr><td>Action/Shooter/Arcade</td><td>Doom, Mortal Kombat</td></tr><tr><td>Miniatures table-top fantasy/sci-fi</td><td>Warhammer</td></tr><tr><td>Games that use miniatures</td><td>Battletech</td></tr><tr><td>War games</td><td>Historical Simulations</td></tr><tr><td>Simulations</td><td>Flight/car Simulators</td></tr><tr><td>Strategy games</td><td>Risk, Civilization</td></tr><tr><td>Social/party games</td><td>Charades, Pictionary</td></tr><tr><td>Strategic sport simulations</td><td>Madden, MLB</td></tr><tr><td>Other non-sport games</td><td>N/A</td></tr></table><p> Specific questions were also designed to separate users of "computer Role Playing Games" vs. "paper Role Playing Games".</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">(*) For my own purposes, I choose to use the term "Tabletop RPGs" in this document; the term "paper RPGs" was used in the study. The terms are synonyms; my choice is simply personal. I believe that in the fairly near future "paper" RPGs will hybridize with computer assistance ñ not becoming "computer RPGs" as that term is commonly understood, but not being games played simply with paper anymore either. Consider this a "forward looking" terminology.</span></p><p></p><p>The term "D&D" is used herein to describe all flavors and types of D&D play; from old "white box" players up to people playtesting 3rd Edition.</p><p></p><p><strong>Section 3: Basic Demographics</strong></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/gamers_monthly_age_1999.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the tabletop RPG marketplace:</p><p></p><p><strong>Tabletop RPGs</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Size</strong><br /> 6% play or have played TRPGs (~ 5.5 million people)<br /> 3% play monthly (~ 2.25 million people)<br /> <br /> <strong>Gender</strong><br /> 19% are female (monthly players)<br /> <br /> <strong>Crossover</strong><br /> 17% of the total play MWGs monthly<br /> 46% of the total play computer RPGs monthly<br /> 26% of the total play TCGs monthly</td></tr></table><p> The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the computer RPG marketplace:</p><p></p><p><strong>Computer RPGs</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Size:</strong><br /> 8% play or have played CRPGs (~7.3 million people)<br /> 5% play monthly (~4.5 million people)<br /> <br /> <strong>Gender</strong><br /> 21% are female<br /> <br /> <strong>Crossover</strong><br /> 33% of the total play tabletop RPGs monthly<br /> 21% of the total play TCGs monthly<br /> 13% of the total play MWGs monthly</td></tr></table><p> The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the MWG marketplace:</p><p></p><p><strong>Miniatures/War Games</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Size</strong><br /> 4% play or have played MWGs (~3.7 million people)<br /> 2% play monthly (~1.8 million people)<br /> <br /> <strong>Gender</strong><br /> 21% are female<br /> <br /> <strong>Crossover</strong><br /> 37% play tabletop RPGs<br /> 40% play computer RPGs<br /> 29% play TCGs</td></tr></table><p> The age breakdown of players within the marketplace is:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Age</strong></td><td><strong>TRPG</strong></td><td><strong>MWG</strong></td><td><strong>CRPG</strong></td><td><strong>All Gamers(*)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>12-15</td><td>23%</td><td>27%</td><td>23%</td><td>11%</td></tr><tr><td>16-18</td><td>18%</td><td>17%</td><td>16%</td><td>7%</td></tr><tr><td>19-24</td><td>25%</td><td>24%</td><td>23%</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>25-35</td><td>34%</td><td>32%</td><td>37%</td><td>29%</td></tr></table><p> <span style="font-size: 9px">(*) "All Gamers" means people in the study population who reported playing >any< of the game types monthly, not just TCGs, RPGs, MWGs or CRPGs.</span></p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>1. Few "General Gamers":</strong></p><p>The first, most notable conclusion we can draw from this information is that the mythical "hobby gamer" who plays TRPGs, CRPGs, MWGs and TCGs comprises a very, very small portion of the total market. A minority of gamers play more than one category of hobby game; very few play all three. The largest overlap, though still a minority, is with CRPGs and TRPGs.</p><p></p><p>This is an exciting conclusion, because it indicates that a company can successfully create brand in one of the three hobby categories, and extend that brand into the other two without significantly cannibalizing sales. In other words, the people who buy the RPG are not likely to be the ones buying the MWG or the TCG.</p><p></p><p><strong>2. There are "Women in Gaming"</strong></p><p>Second, it is clear that female gamers constitute a significant portion of the hobby gaming audience; essentially a fifth of the total market. This represents a total population of several million active female hobby gamers. However, females, as a group, spend less than males on the hobby.</p><p></p><p><strong>3. Adventure Gaming is an adult hobby</strong></p><p>More than half the market for hobby games is older than 19. There is a substantial "dip" in incidence of play from 16-18. This lends credence to the theory that most people are introduced to hobby gaming before high-school and play quite a bit, then leave the hobby until they reach college, and during college they return to the hobby in significant numbers.</p><p></p><p>It may also indicate that the existing group of players is aging and not being refreshed by younger players at the same rate as in previous years.</p><p></p><p><strong>Section 4: The Role of Computers</strong></p><p>There is an intense, ongoing discussion between publishers and customers about the use of computers and the interaction between computer game play and adventure game play. The market research study presented some revealing insights into this ongoing debate.</p><p></p><p><strong>Internet Gaming: </strong>51% of the TRPG players report that they have ever played a game on the internet. 28% report that they play an internet game monthly.</p><p></p><p>% Who want to buy software to help manage game and speed up combat: 52%</p><p>% Who want to play D&D over the internet with others: 50%</p><p>% Who read newsgroups, mailing lists and web sites: 37%</p><p>% Who currently play with computer assistance: 42%</p><p></p><p><strong>What computer do gamers use?</strong></p><p>Wintel Platform: 63%</p><p>Macintosh Platform: 9%</p><p></p><p>(The question was essentially "What platform have you used in the last month", and "none" was an option, probably accounting for the missing percentage.)</p><p></p><p><strong>What's sitting at home?</strong></p><p>Wintel Platform: 54%</p><p>Macintosh Platform: 7%</p><p></p><p>Three quarters of the sample use the Internet at least once a week, but only two thirds have access from home.</p><p></p><p><strong>"Who plays electronic games?"</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td><strong>Computer</strong></td><td><strong>Console/Handheld</strong></td><td><strong>Both</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Average Age</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Education</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% 6th-8th</td><td>5%</td><td>20%</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>% 9th-12th</td><td>23%</td><td>52%</td><td>37%</td></tr><tr><td>% College</td><td>53%</td><td>26%</td><td>31%</td></tr><tr><td>% Post Grad</td><td>20%</td><td>2%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Marital Status</strong></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% Single</td><td>52%</td><td>65%</td><td>76%</td></tr><tr><td>% Partnered</td><td>46%</td><td>29%</td><td>22%</td></tr></table><p> </p><p><strong>Games electronic gamers play monthly</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td><strong>Computer</strong></td><td><strong>Console/Handheld</strong></td><td><strong>Both</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>TRPGs</strong></td><td>72%</td><td>54%</td><td>57%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>CRPGs</strong></td><td>44%</td><td>21%</td><td>50%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Puzzle Comp</strong></td><td>39%</td><td>41%</td><td>49%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Classic Board</strong></td><td>39%</td><td>48%</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Action/Shooter</strong></td><td>32%</td><td>55%</td><td>61%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Simulations</strong></td><td>25%</td><td>36%</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Strategy Games</strong></td><td>26%</td><td>26%</td><td>32%</td></tr></table><p> One conclusion we draw from this data is that people who play electronic games still find time to play TRPGs; it appears that these two pursuits are "complementary" or "noncompetitive" outside the scope of the macroeconomic "disposable income" competition.</p><p></p><p><strong>Section 5: Tabletop RPG Business</strong></p><p>We asked questions of people who play TRPGs to get a better and more detailed picture of that category. This section explores some of that data.</p><p></p><p>The market research study provides some useful information on the games TRPG players play when they're not role playing:</p><p></p><p>51% play a non-TCG card game monthly</p><p>43% play a puzzle computer game monthly</p><p>43% play a classic board game monthly</p><p>58% play an "action/shooter" computer game monthly</p><p>41% play a "simulation" computer game monthly</p><p></p><p>The >least< played game types were:</p><p>26% play a TCG monthly</p><p>24% play a puzzle table game monthly</p><p>17% play a MWG monthly</p><p>17% play a social/party game monthly</p><p></p><p>When asked how likely a person was to be the DM/GM, the responses were:</p><p>2+ Sessions as DM/GM: 47%</p><p>Don't DM/GM: 41%</p><p></p><p>When asked to describe a variety of past game experiences, the market provided the following data:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Question</strong></td><td><strong>Result</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Used detailed tables & charts</td><td>76%</td></tr><tr><td>Included Miniatures</td><td>56%</td></tr><tr><td>Used "rules light" system</td><td>58%</td></tr><tr><td>Diceless</td><td>33%</td></tr><tr><td>Combat Oriented</td><td>86%*</td></tr><tr><td>Live Action</td><td>49%</td></tr><tr><td>House Rules</td><td>80%</td></tr></table><p> (*) Looked at in reverse, this interesting answer tells us that 14% of the gamers who play an RPG >have never played< a combat oriented RPG.</p><p></p><p>Of the people who reported playing a TRPG, we further screened for people who played D&D and asked those individuals some more detailed questions. This data comes from people who have played D&D, not necessarily those who play monthly.</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Age</strong></td><td><12</td><td>12-15</td><td>16-18</td><td>19-24</td><td>25-35</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Learned D&D</strong></td><td>23%</td><td>41%</td><td>15%</td><td>12%</td><td>9%</td></tr></table><p> One conclusion we drew from the data was that if a player had played longer than one year, the chances they would play another year were greater than if they had not yet been playing for a full year. In fact, the longer a person plays, the higher the chance they will stay in the game; in other words, players are >less< likely to quit playing D&D the longer they play, not >more< likely.</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td><strong><= 1 Year</strong></td><td><strong>1-5 Years</strong></td><td><strong>> 5 Years</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Expect another Year</strong></td><td>40%</td><td>75%</td><td>88%</td></tr></table><p> We asked what the frequency of play was:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Total D&D</strong></td><td><strong><= 1 Year</strong></td><td><strong>1-5 Years</strong></td><td><strong>>5 Years</strong></td></tr><tr><td><strong>Monthly</strong></td><td>7.2</td><td>13.2</td><td>5.9</td></tr></table><p> <span style="font-size: 9px">(This data actually reads 7.2 4.9 13.2 5.9; I'm not sure what the extra column is - Morrus)</span></p><p></p><p>So we see that the longer a player is in the game, the fewer times per month they play after the 5th year. Once the "acquisition" period (1st year) has passed, frequency of play accelerates tremendously, then drops. One explanation for this fact may be that since acquisition happens most often at age 15 or less, "new players" may have a lot of time available for gaming, but as they age, they have less time per month to play.</p><p></p><p>We looked at a few other questions based on how long a person had been playing the game:</p><p></p><p>[ if this chart gets mangled in the formatting, it has three columns of data ]</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td>Typical 4 or More Average Sessions</td><td>Session Gamers In before Restart</td><td>5+ Hours Group (New Characters)</td></tr><tr><td><strong>Total</strong></td><td>28%</td><td>62%</td><td>15.4</td></tr><tr><td><strong><=1 Year</strong></td><td>10%</td><td>48%</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td><strong>1-5 Years</strong></td><td>14%</td><td>60%</td><td>12.9</td></tr><tr><td><strong>>5 Years*</strong></td><td>42%</td><td>71%</td><td>19.6</td></tr></table><p> (*) Remember that frequency of play is down sharply for these gamers)</p><p></p><p>This data tells us that the longer a person plays the game, the longer the game sessions get, the more people play in the game, and the longer the game progresses before a character restart. In fact, if you look at the >5 year group, you realize that the big jump in long sessions and in average sessions before a restart means that the 5+ year gamers are playing the same characters, on average, vastly longer than anyone else.</p><p></p><p>One conclusion might be that it takes 5 years for a player to really master the system and really figure out what kind of character that player likes to play.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/gamer_expenditure_1999.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>The following financial figures are for TRPG players in general (D&D information, where available, is provided as well)</p><p></p><p>This data seems to validate the theory that young gamers, while very active, don't spend a lot of money. (The following data is reported by for RPG expenditures) The big dollars come from adults...</p><p></p><p><strong>Total spending by age:</strong></p><p>12-17: $297</p><p>18-24: $850</p><p>25-25: $2,213</p><p></p><p>And, the longer they stay in the category, the greater their total outlays...</p><p></p><p>Play <=1 Year: $116</p><p>Play 1-5 Years: $562</p><p>Play >5 Years: $2,502</p><p></p><p>And if they can be induced to become a DM/GM, expenditures skyrocket.</p><p></p><p>Will DM/GM: $2,048</p><p>Will not DM/GM: $401</p><p></p><p>Some breakouts for the D&D population in particularÖ</p><p></p><p><strong>Total D&D spending by age:</strong></p><p>12-17: $164</p><p>18-24: $443</p><p>25-35: $1,642</p><p></p><p><strong>Monthly D&D spending by age:</strong></p><p>12-17: $10</p><p>18-24: $12</p><p>25-35: $14</p><p></p><p><strong>Total D&D spending by time in game:</strong></p><p><=1 Year: $123</p><p>1-5 Years: $338</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Monthly D&D spending by time in game:</strong></p><p><=1 Year: $7</p><p>1-5 Years: $22</p><p>5 Years: $16</p><p></p><p>(Interesting note: Monthly spending in the first five years after adoption of the game is higher than the spending beyond that point ñ though the older, longer gamer plays the game more, they spend less. This may relate to the frequency of a character/game restart.)</p><p></p><p><strong>D&D DM willingness effect on expenditures:</strong></p><p>Will DM: $1,444 total / $21 monthly</p><p>Will not DM: $187 total / $7 monthly</p><p></p><p>(Interesting note here: Even people who don't DM buy a heck of a lot more than just a PHB...)</p><p></p><p><strong>Effect of miniatures addition to RPG mix:</strong></p><p>Few miniatures owned/used: $139 total RPG spending</p><p>Many minis owned/used: $4,413 total RPG spending</p><p></p><p>We found that players who were ëlapsed' ñ reported that they had played TRPGs but were not currently doing so; had spent more money than the current players, and had played more different games monthly ñ but interestingly, they had spent less money, on average, on D&D than players who were "current".</p><p></p><p><strong>Current/Lapsed</strong></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Mean RPG Spending</strong></td><td><strong>Mean D&D Spending</strong></td><td><strong>Total RPGs Played</strong></td></tr><tr><td>$1,273 / $1,667</td><td>$895 / $599</td><td>2.2 / 3.3</td></tr></table><p> One conclusion that could be drawn from this data is that gamers who don't like D&D will spend a lot of money and try a lot of systems to find something they do like before they quit. Gamers who like D&D will spend less money and try fewer systems, but will spend more on D&D than those who don't.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/trpg_monthly_1999.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p><p></p><p>When asked why a gamer lapsed, the answers (multiple choices allowed) were:</p><p></p><p>Got too busy with other things: 79%</p><p>Too few people to play with: 63%</p><p>Not enough time to play: 55%</p><p>Found a game I liked better: 38%</p><p>Unhappy with the game and the rules: 38%</p><p>Cost too much money: 32%</p><p>Burnt out from frequent play: 29%</p><p></p><p>Getting back to the people still playing the games, when asked what games TRPG players play monthly, the answers (multiple choices allowed) were:</p><p></p><p>D&D: 66%</p><p>Vampire: The Masquerade: 25%</p><p>Star Wars: 21%</p><p>Palladium: 16%</p><p>Werewolf: The Apocalypse: 15%</p><p>Shadowrun: 15%</p><p>Star Trek: 12%</p><p>Call of Cthulu: 8%</p><p>Legend of the Five Rings: 8%</p><p>Deadlands: 5%</p><p>Alternity: 4%</p><p>GURPS: 3%</p><p></p><p>When asked to describe aspects of their games, on a scale from 1 to 5, answers were:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td></td><td><strong>Normally</strong></td><td><strong>Rarely</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Create Own Adventures</td><td>42%</td><td>11%</td></tr><tr><td>Create Own Campaign Material</td><td>29%</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>Replay Adventures</td><td>18%</td><td>35%</td></tr><tr><td>Use adventures from magazines</td><td>21%</td><td>40%</td></tr><tr><td>Follow official D&D Rules</td><td>33%</td><td>17%</td></tr></table><p> When we asked RPG purchasers how many had purchased D&D at a particular retail type, the answers were:</p><p></p><p>(*)Hobby/game shops: 36%</p><p>Book Stores: 27%</p><p>Comic book stores: 18%</p><p>Specialty toy and game: 17%</p><p>Large toy store chains: 15%</p><p>Conventions: 4%</p><p></p><p>(In other words, 36% of the respondents indicated they had purchased a D&D product at a Hobby/Game shop.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Morrus, post: 7652949, member: 1"] Wizards of the Coast regularly surveys various aspects of the adventure gaming channel; distributors, retailers and consumers to better understand their preferences, concerns, and needs. That data is regularly reviewed and distributed internally to senior management. The contents of this file are excerpts from those sources; the source materials themselves are confidential internal documents and are not available to the public. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] [B]Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0 Release Date: February 07, 2000[/B] Summary prepared by: Ryan S. Dancey, Vice President, Wizards of the Coast; Brand Manager, Dungeons & Dragons [B]Permissions:[/B] This file is Copyright 2000, Wizards of the Coast. This file may be freely redistributed or quoted in whole or part, provided that this attribution remains intact. [B]Methodology: [/B]Wizards of the Coast regularly surveys various aspects of the adventure gaming channel; distributors, retailers and consumers to better understand their preferences, concerns, and needs. That data is regularly reviewed and distributed internally to senior management. The contents of this file are excerpts from those sources; the source materials themselves are confidential internal documents and are not available to the public. You have my assurances that to the best of my ability, the information presented in this document represents a fair and accurate representation of the data. [B]Sources:[/B] The primary source is a market segmentation study conducted in the summer of 1999. No confidential information provided by non-Wizards companies was used in the preparation of this report. [B]Exclusions: [/B]The internal information gathered by Wizards is considered an important competitive advantage. Therefore, not all the information available to Wizards is incorporated in this document, and there may be areas where substantial, significant information is purposefully not included. An effort has been made to ensure that the absence of any portion of this confidential information would not render the material provided herein inaccurate or invalid. [B]Pokemon Effect: [/B]As this study was conducted just as the Pokemon TCG phenomenon was gathering speed. For this, and several internal reasons, I have elected not to present information on the TCG component of the industry at this time. [B]Updates:[/B] From time to time, I intend to revise and update this file to reflect our ongoing efforts to understand the industry. When an update occurs, the version number of the document will be changed, as will the "release date". Interested parties can write to me at [EMAIL]ryand@frpg.com[/EMAIL] to request an up to date copy of this document. [B]Section 1: The Segmentation Study[/B] Since so much of this data is derived from the '99 Segmentation Study, it is important that the reader understand how this data was gathered. For the purpose of the 1999 study, the following methodology was employed: A two phase approach was used to determine information about trading card games (TCGs), role playing games (RPGs) and miniatures wargames (MWG) in the general US population between the ages of 12 and 35. For the rest of this document, this group is referred to as "the marketplace" or "the market", or "the consumers". This age bracket was arbitrarily chosen on the basis of internal analysis regarding the probable target customers for the company's products. We know for certain that there are lots of gamers older than 35, especially for games like Dungeons & Dragons; however, we wanted to keep the study to a manageable size and profile. Perhaps in a few years a more detailed study will be done of the entire population. Information from more than 65,000 people was gathered from a questionnaire sent to more than 20,000 households via a post card survey. This survey was used as a "screener" to create a general profile of the game playing population in the target age range, for the purposes of extrapolating trends to the general population. This "screener" accurately represents the US population as a whole; it is a snapshot of the entire nation and is used to extrapolate trends from more focused surveys to the larger market. A follow up survey was completed by about a thousand respondents from the "screener". The follow up survey is an extensive document with more than 100 questions. The particular individuals chosen to participate in this expanded survey represent the population, as determined by the screener. In other words, the small detailed survey group can be reasonably extrapolated to the larger screener group, and the larger screener group can be logically extrapolated to the public in general. This is a common, standard, and accepted methodology within the market research field. The data from the detailed survey was collated and prepared by the Wizards market Research Department, in conjunction with an external consulting firm. We believe that the data is a fair and accurate representation of the hobby game consumer profile and that it does statistically correlate with the population as a whole in the US for the target age bracket. [B]Section 2: Basic Terms[/B] As a part of the detailed survey, the following terms and examples were provided to the respondents: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Term[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Example[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Paper RPGs*[/TD] [TD]Dungeons & Dragons[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Card Games[/TD] [TD]Bridge, Solitaire, Uno, Poker[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Trading Card Games[/TD] [TD]Magic, Pokemon[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Word/ knowledge[/TD] [TD]Scrabble, Trivial Pursuit[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Puzzle computer games[/TD] [TD]Tetris[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Non-competitive problem solving[/TD] [TD]Sim City, Myst[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Puzzle table games[/TD] [TD]Jenga, Dominoes[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Class board games[/TD] [TD]Chess, Monopoly, Go[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Action/Shooter/Arcade[/TD] [TD]Doom, Mortal Kombat[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Miniatures table-top fantasy/sci-fi[/TD] [TD]Warhammer[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Games that use miniatures[/TD] [TD]Battletech[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]War games[/TD] [TD]Historical Simulations[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Simulations[/TD] [TD]Flight/car Simulators[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Strategy games[/TD] [TD]Risk, Civilization[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Social/party games[/TD] [TD]Charades, Pictionary[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Strategic sport simulations[/TD] [TD]Madden, MLB[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Other non-sport games[/TD] [TD]N/A[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Specific questions were also designed to separate users of "computer Role Playing Games" vs. "paper Role Playing Games". [SIZE=1](*) For my own purposes, I choose to use the term "Tabletop RPGs" in this document; the term "paper RPGs" was used in the study. The terms are synonyms; my choice is simply personal. I believe that in the fairly near future "paper" RPGs will hybridize with computer assistance ñ not becoming "computer RPGs" as that term is commonly understood, but not being games played simply with paper anymore either. Consider this a "forward looking" terminology.[/SIZE] The term "D&D" is used herein to describe all flavors and types of D&D play; from old "white box" players up to people playtesting 3rd Edition. [B]Section 3: Basic Demographics[/B] [img]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/gamers_monthly_age_1999.jpg[/img] The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the tabletop RPG marketplace: [B]Tabletop RPGs[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Size[/B] 6% play or have played TRPGs (~ 5.5 million people) 3% play monthly (~ 2.25 million people) [B]Gender[/B] 19% are female (monthly players) [B]Crossover[/B] 17% of the total play MWGs monthly 46% of the total play computer RPGs monthly 26% of the total play TCGs monthly[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the computer RPG marketplace: [B]Computer RPGs[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Size:[/B] 8% play or have played CRPGs (~7.3 million people) 5% play monthly (~4.5 million people) [B]Gender[/B] 21% are female [B]Crossover[/B] 33% of the total play tabletop RPGs monthly 21% of the total play TCGs monthly 13% of the total play MWGs monthly[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] The study provides the following information about the basic demographics of the MWG marketplace: [B]Miniatures/War Games[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Size[/B] 4% play or have played MWGs (~3.7 million people) 2% play monthly (~1.8 million people) [B]Gender[/B] 21% are female [B]Crossover[/B] 37% play tabletop RPGs 40% play computer RPGs 29% play TCGs[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] The age breakdown of players within the marketplace is: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Age[/B][/TD] [TD][B]TRPG[/B][/TD] [TD][B]MWG[/B][/TD] [TD][B]CRPG[/B][/TD] [TD][B]All Gamers(*)[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]12-15[/TD] [TD]23%[/TD] [TD]27%[/TD] [TD]23%[/TD] [TD]11%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]16-18[/TD] [TD]18%[/TD] [TD]17%[/TD] [TD]16%[/TD] [TD]7%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]19-24[/TD] [TD]25%[/TD] [TD]24%[/TD] [TD]23%[/TD] [TD]13%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]25-35[/TD] [TD]34%[/TD] [TD]32%[/TD] [TD]37%[/TD] [TD]29%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [SIZE=1](*) "All Gamers" means people in the study population who reported playing >any< of the game types monthly, not just TCGs, RPGs, MWGs or CRPGs.[/SIZE] [B]Conclusions: 1. Few "General Gamers":[/B] The first, most notable conclusion we can draw from this information is that the mythical "hobby gamer" who plays TRPGs, CRPGs, MWGs and TCGs comprises a very, very small portion of the total market. A minority of gamers play more than one category of hobby game; very few play all three. The largest overlap, though still a minority, is with CRPGs and TRPGs. This is an exciting conclusion, because it indicates that a company can successfully create brand in one of the three hobby categories, and extend that brand into the other two without significantly cannibalizing sales. In other words, the people who buy the RPG are not likely to be the ones buying the MWG or the TCG. [B]2. There are "Women in Gaming"[/B] Second, it is clear that female gamers constitute a significant portion of the hobby gaming audience; essentially a fifth of the total market. This represents a total population of several million active female hobby gamers. However, females, as a group, spend less than males on the hobby. [B]3. Adventure Gaming is an adult hobby[/B] More than half the market for hobby games is older than 19. There is a substantial "dip" in incidence of play from 16-18. This lends credence to the theory that most people are introduced to hobby gaming before high-school and play quite a bit, then leave the hobby until they reach college, and during college they return to the hobby in significant numbers. It may also indicate that the existing group of players is aging and not being refreshed by younger players at the same rate as in previous years. [B]Section 4: The Role of Computers[/B] There is an intense, ongoing discussion between publishers and customers about the use of computers and the interaction between computer game play and adventure game play. The market research study presented some revealing insights into this ongoing debate. [B]Internet Gaming: [/B]51% of the TRPG players report that they have ever played a game on the internet. 28% report that they play an internet game monthly. % Who want to buy software to help manage game and speed up combat: 52% % Who want to play D&D over the internet with others: 50% % Who read newsgroups, mailing lists and web sites: 37% % Who currently play with computer assistance: 42% [B]What computer do gamers use?[/B] Wintel Platform: 63% Macintosh Platform: 9% (The question was essentially "What platform have you used in the last month", and "none" was an option, probably accounting for the missing percentage.) [B]What's sitting at home?[/B] Wintel Platform: 54% Macintosh Platform: 7% Three quarters of the sample use the Internet at least once a week, but only two thirds have access from home. [B]"Who plays electronic games?"[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][B]Computer[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Console/Handheld[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Both[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Average Age[/TD] [TD]26[/TD] [TD]23[/TD] [TD]20[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Education[/B][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% 6th-8th[/TD] [TD]5%[/TD] [TD]20%[/TD] [TD]27%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% 9th-12th[/TD] [TD]23%[/TD] [TD]52%[/TD] [TD]37%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% College[/TD] [TD]53%[/TD] [TD]26%[/TD] [TD]31%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% Post Grad[/TD] [TD]20%[/TD] [TD]2%[/TD] [TD]5%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Marital Status[/B][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% Single[/TD] [TD]52%[/TD] [TD]65%[/TD] [TD]76%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]% Partnered[/TD] [TD]46%[/TD] [TD]29%[/TD] [TD]22%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [B]Games electronic gamers play monthly[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][B]Computer[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Console/Handheld[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Both[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]TRPGs[/B][/TD] [TD]72%[/TD] [TD]54%[/TD] [TD]57%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]CRPGs[/B][/TD] [TD]44%[/TD] [TD]21%[/TD] [TD]50%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Puzzle Comp[/B][/TD] [TD]39%[/TD] [TD]41%[/TD] [TD]49%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Classic Board[/B][/TD] [TD]39%[/TD] [TD]48%[/TD] [TD]44%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Action/Shooter[/B][/TD] [TD]32%[/TD] [TD]55%[/TD] [TD]61%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Simulations[/B][/TD] [TD]25%[/TD] [TD]36%[/TD] [TD]40%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Strategy Games[/B][/TD] [TD]26%[/TD] [TD]26%[/TD] [TD]32%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] One conclusion we draw from this data is that people who play electronic games still find time to play TRPGs; it appears that these two pursuits are "complementary" or "noncompetitive" outside the scope of the macroeconomic "disposable income" competition. [B]Section 5: Tabletop RPG Business[/B] We asked questions of people who play TRPGs to get a better and more detailed picture of that category. This section explores some of that data. The market research study provides some useful information on the games TRPG players play when they're not role playing: 51% play a non-TCG card game monthly 43% play a puzzle computer game monthly 43% play a classic board game monthly 58% play an "action/shooter" computer game monthly 41% play a "simulation" computer game monthly The >least< played game types were: 26% play a TCG monthly 24% play a puzzle table game monthly 17% play a MWG monthly 17% play a social/party game monthly When asked how likely a person was to be the DM/GM, the responses were: 2+ Sessions as DM/GM: 47% Don't DM/GM: 41% When asked to describe a variety of past game experiences, the market provided the following data: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Question[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Result[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Used detailed tables & charts[/TD] [TD]76%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Included Miniatures[/TD] [TD]56%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Used "rules light" system[/TD] [TD]58%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Diceless[/TD] [TD]33%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Combat Oriented[/TD] [TD]86%*[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Live Action[/TD] [TD]49%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]House Rules[/TD] [TD]80%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] (*) Looked at in reverse, this interesting answer tells us that 14% of the gamers who play an RPG >have never played< a combat oriented RPG. Of the people who reported playing a TRPG, we further screened for people who played D&D and asked those individuals some more detailed questions. This data comes from people who have played D&D, not necessarily those who play monthly. [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Age[/B][/TD] [TD]<12[/TD] [TD]12-15[/TD] [TD]16-18[/TD] [TD]19-24[/TD] [TD]25-35[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Learned D&D[/B][/TD] [TD]23%[/TD] [TD]41%[/TD] [TD]15%[/TD] [TD]12%[/TD] [TD]9%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] One conclusion we drew from the data was that if a player had played longer than one year, the chances they would play another year were greater than if they had not yet been playing for a full year. In fact, the longer a person plays, the higher the chance they will stay in the game; in other words, players are >less< likely to quit playing D&D the longer they play, not >more< likely. [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][B]<= 1 Year[/B][/TD] [TD][B]1-5 Years[/B][/TD] [TD][B]> 5 Years[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Expect another Year[/B][/TD] [TD]40%[/TD] [TD]75%[/TD] [TD]88%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] We asked what the frequency of play was: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Total D&D[/B][/TD] [TD][B]<= 1 Year[/B][/TD] [TD][B]1-5 Years[/B][/TD] [TD][B]>5 Years[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Monthly[/B][/TD] [TD]7.2[/TD] [TD]13.2[/TD] [TD]5.9[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [SIZE=1](This data actually reads 7.2 4.9 13.2 5.9; I'm not sure what the extra column is - Morrus)[/SIZE] So we see that the longer a player is in the game, the fewer times per month they play after the 5th year. Once the "acquisition" period (1st year) has passed, frequency of play accelerates tremendously, then drops. One explanation for this fact may be that since acquisition happens most often at age 15 or less, "new players" may have a lot of time available for gaming, but as they age, they have less time per month to play. We looked at a few other questions based on how long a person had been playing the game: [ if this chart gets mangled in the formatting, it has three columns of data ] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD]Typical 4 or More Average Sessions[/TD] [TD]Session Gamers In before Restart[/TD] [TD]5+ Hours Group (New Characters)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Total[/B][/TD] [TD]28%[/TD] [TD]62%[/TD] [TD]15.4[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]<=1 Year[/B][/TD] [TD]10%[/TD] [TD]48%[/TD] [TD]8.8[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]1-5 Years[/B][/TD] [TD]14%[/TD] [TD]60%[/TD] [TD]12.9[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]>5 Years*[/B][/TD] [TD]42%[/TD] [TD]71%[/TD] [TD]19.6[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] (*) Remember that frequency of play is down sharply for these gamers) This data tells us that the longer a person plays the game, the longer the game sessions get, the more people play in the game, and the longer the game progresses before a character restart. In fact, if you look at the >5 year group, you realize that the big jump in long sessions and in average sessions before a restart means that the 5+ year gamers are playing the same characters, on average, vastly longer than anyone else. One conclusion might be that it takes 5 years for a player to really master the system and really figure out what kind of character that player likes to play. [img]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/gamer_expenditure_1999.jpg[/img] The following financial figures are for TRPG players in general (D&D information, where available, is provided as well) This data seems to validate the theory that young gamers, while very active, don't spend a lot of money. (The following data is reported by for RPG expenditures) The big dollars come from adults... [B]Total spending by age:[/B] 12-17: $297 18-24: $850 25-25: $2,213 And, the longer they stay in the category, the greater their total outlays... Play <=1 Year: $116 Play 1-5 Years: $562 Play >5 Years: $2,502 And if they can be induced to become a DM/GM, expenditures skyrocket. Will DM/GM: $2,048 Will not DM/GM: $401 Some breakouts for the D&D population in particularÖ [B]Total D&D spending by age:[/B] 12-17: $164 18-24: $443 25-35: $1,642 [B]Monthly D&D spending by age:[/B] 12-17: $10 18-24: $12 25-35: $14 [B]Total D&D spending by time in game:[/B] <=1 Year: $123 1-5 Years: $338 [B]Monthly D&D spending by time in game:[/B] <=1 Year: $7 1-5 Years: $22 5 Years: $16 (Interesting note: Monthly spending in the first five years after adoption of the game is higher than the spending beyond that point ñ though the older, longer gamer plays the game more, they spend less. This may relate to the frequency of a character/game restart.) [B]D&D DM willingness effect on expenditures:[/B] Will DM: $1,444 total / $21 monthly Will not DM: $187 total / $7 monthly (Interesting note here: Even people who don't DM buy a heck of a lot more than just a PHB...) [B]Effect of miniatures addition to RPG mix:[/B] Few miniatures owned/used: $139 total RPG spending Many minis owned/used: $4,413 total RPG spending We found that players who were ëlapsed' ñ reported that they had played TRPGs but were not currently doing so; had spent more money than the current players, and had played more different games monthly ñ but interestingly, they had spent less money, on average, on D&D than players who were "current". [B]Current/Lapsed[/B] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Mean RPG Spending[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Mean D&D Spending[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Total RPGs Played[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]$1,273 / $1,667[/TD] [TD]$895 / $599[/TD] [TD]2.2 / 3.3[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] One conclusion that could be drawn from this data is that gamers who don't like D&D will spend a lot of money and try a lot of systems to find something they do like before they quit. Gamers who like D&D will spend less money and try fewer systems, but will spend more on D&D than those who don't. [img]http://www.enworld.org/newsimages/trpg_monthly_1999.jpg[/img] When asked why a gamer lapsed, the answers (multiple choices allowed) were: Got too busy with other things: 79% Too few people to play with: 63% Not enough time to play: 55% Found a game I liked better: 38% Unhappy with the game and the rules: 38% Cost too much money: 32% Burnt out from frequent play: 29% Getting back to the people still playing the games, when asked what games TRPG players play monthly, the answers (multiple choices allowed) were: D&D: 66% Vampire: The Masquerade: 25% Star Wars: 21% Palladium: 16% Werewolf: The Apocalypse: 15% Shadowrun: 15% Star Trek: 12% Call of Cthulu: 8% Legend of the Five Rings: 8% Deadlands: 5% Alternity: 4% GURPS: 3% When asked to describe aspects of their games, on a scale from 1 to 5, answers were: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][/TD] [TD][B]Normally[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Rarely[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Create Own Adventures[/TD] [TD]42%[/TD] [TD]11%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Create Own Campaign Material[/TD] [TD]29%[/TD] [TD]17%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Replay Adventures[/TD] [TD]18%[/TD] [TD]35%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Use adventures from magazines[/TD] [TD]21%[/TD] [TD]40%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Follow official D&D Rules[/TD] [TD]33%[/TD] [TD]17%[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] When we asked RPG purchasers how many had purchased D&D at a particular retail type, the answers were: (*)Hobby/game shops: 36% Book Stores: 27% Comic book stores: 18% Specialty toy and game: 17% Large toy store chains: 15% Conventions: 4% (In other words, 36% of the respondents indicated they had purchased a D&D product at a Hobby/Game shop.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Promotions/Press
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Top